Table 3.
Variable | Adj. mean score | β | SE | t value | p value* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work-from-home satisfaction: overall scores Lower scores indicate greater satisfaction | |||||
Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ | 7.68 | − 0.85 | 0.44 | − 1.91 | 0.06 |
Gender, female vs. male | 7.47 | − 1.25 | 0.58 | − 2.16 | 0.03 |
Work-from-home satisfaction: increased work satisfaction Lower scores indicate greater satisfaction | |||||
Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ | 1.46 | − 0.25 | 0.12 | − 2.10 | 0.04 |
Gender, female vs. male | 1.45 | − 0.26 | 0.16 | − 1.68 | 0.09 |
Work-from-home satisfaction: increased ability to feel safe Lower scores indicate greater feelings of safety | |||||
Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ | 1.35 | 0.01 | 0.09 | − 0.11 | 0.91 |
Gender, female vs. male | 1.21 | − 0.28 | 0.13 | − 2.27 | 0.02 |
Work-from-home satisfaction: reduced overall stress Lower scores indicate lower overall stress | |||||
Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ | 1.52 | − 0.30 | 0.12 | − 2.39 | 0.02 |
Gender, female vs. male | 1.48 | − 0.36 | 0.17 | − 2.19 | 0.03 |
Work-from-home satisfaction: interfered with work efficiency Reverse scored: lower scores indicate less interference with work efficiency | |||||
Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ | 1.65 | − 0.20 | 0.13 | − 1.60 | 0.11 |
Gender, female vs. male | 1.56 | − 0.39 | 0.17 | − 2.31 | 0.02 |
Work-from-home satisfaction: interfered with work team cohesion Reverse scored: lower scores indicate less interference with team cohesion | |||||
Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ | 1.95 | − 0.35 | 0.16 | − 2.15 | 0.03 |
Gender, female vs. male | 1.95 | − 0.34 | 0.21 | − 1.61 | 0.11 |
*Bold rows indicate p < 0.05