Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 20;38(3):627–632. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07785-x

Table 3.

Associations Between WFH Scale Items and Respondent Age and Gender Characteristics, Adjusted for Administrative Workload

Variable Adj. mean score β SE t value p value*

Work-from-home satisfaction: overall scores

Lower scores indicate greater satisfaction

  Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ 7.68 − 0.85 0.44 − 1.91 0.06
  Gender, female vs. male 7.47 − 1.25 0.58 − 2.16 0.03

Work-from-home satisfaction: increased work satisfaction

Lower scores indicate greater satisfaction

  Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ 1.46 − 0.25 0.12 − 2.10 0.04
  Gender, female vs. male 1.45 − 0.26 0.16 − 1.68 0.09

Work-from-home satisfaction: increased ability to feel safe

Lower scores indicate greater feelings of safety

  Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ 1.35 0.01 0.09 − 0.11 0.91
  Gender, female vs. male 1.21 − 0.28 0.13 − 2.27 0.02

Work-from-home satisfaction: reduced overall stress

Lower scores indicate lower overall stress

  Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ 1.52 − 0.30 0.12 − 2.39 0.02
  Gender, female vs. male 1.48 − 0.36 0.17 − 2.19 0.03

Work-from-home satisfaction: interfered with work efficiency

Reverse scored: lower scores indicate less interference with work efficiency

  Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ 1.65 − 0.20 0.13 − 1.60 0.11
  Gender, female vs. male 1.56 − 0.39 0.17 − 2.31 0.02

Work-from-home satisfaction: interfered with work team cohesion

Reverse scored: lower scores indicate less interference with team cohesion

  Age, 18–49 vs. 50+ 1.95 − 0.35 0.16 − 2.15 0.03
  Gender, female vs. male 1.95 − 0.34 0.21 − 1.61 0.11

*Bold rows indicate p < 0.05