TABLE 2.
Behavioral results for vigilance task.
Variables | Session | Group | Session × Group | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
F | p | η2 | F | p | η2 | F | p | η2 | |
Target hits | 2.49 (3.81) | 0.066 | 0.08 | 0.38 (1.27) | 0.543 | 0.01 | 0.12 (3.81) | 0.949 | 0.004 |
Reaction time | 2.44 (3.81) | 0.071 | 0.08 | 1.07 (1.27) | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.72 (3.81) | 0.545 | 0.03 |
False alarms | 4.1 (3.81) | 0.034* | 0.13 | 0.15 (1.27) | 0.702 | 0.006 | 0.59 (3.81) | 0.513 | 0.02 |
Sensitivity d’ | 3.80 (3.81) | 0.013* | 0.12 | 0.06 (1.27) | 0.803 | 0.002 | 0.11 (3.81) | 0.951 | 0.004 |
Log β | 1.95 (3.81) | 0.128 | 0.07 | 1.26 (1.27) | 0.272 | 0.05 | 0.83 (3.81) | 0.481 | 0.03 |
Mental effort | 2.73 (3.81) | 0.074 | 0.09 | 0.21 (1.27) | 0.651 | 0.01 | 1.55 (3.81) | 0.221 | 0.05 |
SSS score | 11.0 (4.108) | <0.001*** | 0.29 | 0.0002 (1.27) | 0.988 | <0.001 | 0.43 (4.108) | 0.726 | 0.02 |
***p < 0.001 and *p < 0.05. Note, the Greenhouse–Geisser sphericity correction was applied when necessary, the same below.