Table 3.
Summary of the mixed-effects linear regression on latency to reach reward bucket in successful trials.
| Variable | Levels | n | EMM | SE(EMM) | 95% CI(EMM) | Df | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Continuous | 29 | 47.1 | 3.7 | 39.5–54.8 | 1 | 0.97 | ns |
| Breed | Holstein | 18 | 45.7 | 4.4 | 36.7–54.7 | 1 | 0.69 | ns |
| Red | 11 | 48.6 | 5.9 | 36.4–60.7 | ||||
| Treatment | Observer | 14 | 41.3 | 4.9 | 31.2–51.3 | 1 | 0.08 | ns |
| Control | 15 | 53.0 | 5.2 | 42.4–63.7 | ||||
| Trial | First | 27 | 44.5 | 4.5 | 35.6–53.5 | |||
| Second | 19 | 42.3 | 5.2 | 31.9–52.8 | 2 | 0.15 | ns | |
| Third | 15 | 54.6 | 5.9 | 42.7–66.4 | ||||
| Route | Demonstration | 41 | 39.2 | 4.2 | 30.7–47.7 | 1 | 0.01 | ** |
| Opposite | 20 | 55.1 | 5.5 | 44.0–66.1 |
Mixed-effects linear regression done with lme4 package. Variables include age (numeric variable), breed (categorical variable with two levels), treatment (categorical variable with two levels), trial (categorical variable with three levels) and route (categorical variable with two levels). The results are on the response scale and estimated marginal means have been calculated with emmeans package for each variable: n, number of observations; EMM, Estimated Marginal Mean; SE(EMM), standard error of EMM; 95% CI(EMM), confidence interval of EMM; Df, degrees of freedom and p-values were calculated in ANOVA with car package.
p < 0.01. ns, not significant.