Table 5.
Outcome of some studies on different cements retention for post and cores
| Author | Type of post | Compared cements | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Habib et al., 2005[154] | Custom cast posts | ZP and self-etch dual RC | ZP had higher retentive values compared to RC |
| Duncan and Pameijer, 1998[155] | Parallel titanium posts | RC, ZP, GI, and RMGI | RC provided higher retention than others |
| Chan et al., 1993[156] | Stainless steel paraposts | ZP, ZPC, GI, RC | Stainless steel posts cemented with RC exhibited higher resistance to dislodgement by vertical tensile forces |
| Cohen et al., 1999[157] | Stainless steel posts | RC and ZP | Stainless steel dowels have been shown to be more retentive thancarbon fiber posts when cemented with either RC or ZP cement |
| Lencioni et al., 2010[158] | Pure titanium posts | Self-etch RC, self-adhesive RC, ZP | Posts fixed with self-adhesive RC presented superior bond strength compared to ZP and self-etch cements |
| Ubaldini et al., 2018[159] | Fiber posts | Etch and rinse RC and self-etch adhesive RC | Etch and rinse RC provided higher retention for fiber posts |
| Radke RA, 1988[74] | Cast gold posts | ZP, GI, ZPC | ZP and GI cements were found to be more retentive than ZPC |
| Sahmali et al., 2004[160] | Ceramic posts and carbon fiber posts | Self-etch RC, RMGI, GI | Self-etch RC had significantly higher bond strength than two other cements |
| Hagge et al., 2002[161] | Prefabricated post(paraposts) | Self-etch RC, ZP | Self-etch RC demonstrated higher retention than ZP |
| Bonfante et al., 2007[37] | Glass fiber posts | RMGI, dualcure RC | RC provided higher tensile bond strength for glass fiber posts |
| Menani et al., 2008[162] | Cast posts(gold alloypure titanium) | ZP, RC | Both cements provided similar mean tensile retention |
| Cohen et al., 1998[163] | Flexi-post, access post, titanium post | Composite cement, ZP, advance, duet, and GI | Composite cement provided higher retention for all types of posts |
| Sen et al., 2004[164] | Prefabricated posts(ParaPost, Flexi-Post) | Etch and rinse RC, ParaPost Cement, Flexi-Flow Natural, and ZP | Flexi-post showed significantly higher retentive strengths compared to non-threaded posts RC significantly increased the dowel retention compared to ZP |
| Ertugrul and Ismail, 2005[76] | Cast metal posts | RC, ZP | ZP cement provided greater tensile bond strength than RC with and without silane coating agent |
ZP: Zinc phosphate; GI: Glassionomer; RC: Resin cement; RMGI: Resin-modified glass ionomer