Table 21.
Comparison of hSMA-SA results for three-bar truss optimization with known techniques
| Competitive techniques | Optimal values for variables | Optimum weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | ||
| Proposed hSMA-SA | 0.767861026 | 0.470855717 | 264.2694671 |
| Ray and Liew [166] | 0.788621037 | 0.408401334 | 263.8958466 |
| Hernandez | 0.788 | 0.408 | 263.9 |
| CS [167] | 0.789 | 0.409 | 263.972 |
| Ray and Saini [168] | 0.795 | 0.398 | 264.3 |
| HHO-SCA [54] | 0.788498 | 0.40875 | 263.8958665 |
| Gandomi [169] | 0.78867 | 0.40902 | 263.9716 |
| CSA [170] | 0.788638976 | 0.408350573 | 263.895844337 |
| GWO-SA [171] | 0.789 | 0.408 | 263.896 |
| MBA [169] | 0.789 | 0.409 | 263.896 |
| WDE [52] | 0.515535107819326 | 0.0156341500434795 | 2.639297829829848E+02 |
| ALO [152] | 0.789 | 0.408 | 263.8958434 |
| DEDS [172] | 0.789 | 0.408 | 263.896 |
| Raj et al. | 0.789764410 | 0.405176050 | 263.89671 |