Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 30;6(9):nzac123. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac123

TABLE 1.

Examples of big data contributions to obesity research, by research dimension1

Research dimension Research question Data needed Potential data sources Methods needed Potential outcomes
  • Food/nutrient intake and eating behavior—nutritional theme

  • How do food characteristics (taste, texture) interact with social setting to control satiety?

  • Rich food composition and features database [volume/variety]

  • Objective measures of social setting: eating regularity and duration, family, school, and peer eating activity [volume/variety]

  • Timing of food intake and objective/subjective satiety measures in real-time, not, e.g., daily average [velocity]

  • National food consumption surveys

  • EFSA food composition database (97)

  • Publicly available nutrition and food composition applications—as documented (98, 99)

  • Automated or semiautomated food profiling/food composition spectrometry in FAIR databases

  • Automated meal sensing (wearable sensors/AI-driven meal picture analysis, observational restaurants)

  • Mobile-based surveys

  • Research: integrated biological, economic, and social sciences understanding of the determinants of food intake

  • Innovations: novel food types with high satiety index

  • Policies: health policy promoting specific eating practices in schools, families, and workplaces, according to healthy and sustainable FBDGs; tailored to context

  • Social food environments—psycho-social theme

  • What role does food and diet portrayal in digital media (advertising and social media) play in food and beverage intake?

  • Real-time food-intake assessments and subjective/objective determinants of satiety [volume, velocity]

  • Social media and real-world advertising exposure logs [variety]

  • Source of digital media advertising/marketing (e.g., via industry or from users themselves)

  • National food consumption surveys

  • Social media content, behavior and network data via APIs/web scraping

  • Regional/local census and statistics bureaus

  • Mobile/sensor-based food intake measurements

  • Citizen/crowd-sourced mapping tools

  • Monitoring of digital advertisements (e.g., via Web browser/application plugins)

  • Research: role of social media, influence, and social networks in obesogenic behaviors

  • Innovations: effective healthy diet–targeted advertisement campaigns/nudging

  • Policies: food advertisement policies for more targeted restriction/promotion of certain foods


  • Built environment—environmental theme

  • What combinations of features of the built environment influence physical activity levels and weight status?

  • GIS-derived points of interest per region [volume/variety]

  • Socioeconomic, education, ability, and health characteristics [volume/variety]

  • Real-time, GPS-correlated physical activity measurement [volume/velocity]

  • National food consumption surveys

  • GIS/Google/Foursquare

  • USDA Food Environment Atlas

  • Regional/local census and statistics bureaus (e.g., Eurostat)

  • Map the Meal Gap (US) (100)

  • Food Environment Atlas (US) (101)

  • Global Physical Activity Observatory (102)

  • Computational tools for scraping environment characteristics, linked in real-time to user activity

  • Mobile-based tracking of anthropometry and activity levels

  • Research: relation between built environment, physical activity, health-related behaviors, and obesity prevalence

  • Innovations: interactive intervention/policy design tools; tools for real-time monitoring of policies and interventions

  • Policies: toward healthier, physical-activity-promoting, and accessible urban and suburban environments

1

AI, artificial intelligence; API, Application Programming Interface; EFSA, European Food Safety Authority; FAIR, findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable; FBDG, food-based dietary guideline; GIS, Geographic Information Systems; GPS, Global Positioning System.