Table 3.
L-Citrulline(pg/ml) | Indoleacetic Acid(ng/ml) | Chenodeoxycholic Acid (nmol/L) | Eicosapentaenoic Acid (pg/ml) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects, n | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Control | 286.68 ± 85.17 | 70.47 ± 23.80 | 1651.27 ± 577.20 | 312.45 ± 47.91 |
T2DM | 500.11 ± 276.85 | 53.33 ± 16.66 | 2650.36 ± 469.08 | 263.19 ± 38.20 |
NPDR | 180.52 ± 110.30 | 83.48 ± 20.29 | 2022.46 ± 710.91 | 256.05 ± 27.69 |
PDR | 169.37 ± 141.23 | 93.16 ± 37.28 | 826.51 ± 667.37 | 196.51 ± 22.55 |
DR | 174.94 ± 126.83 | 88.32 ± 30.40 | 1426.30 ± 888.79 | 226.28 ± 39.03 |
P-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Pa | 0.001 | 0.359 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Pb | 0.284 | 0.633 | 0.570 | < 0.001 |
Pc | 0.193 | 0.116 | 0.013 | < 0.001 |
Pd | 0.122 | 0.185 | 0.830 | < 0.001 |
Pe | < 0.001 | 0.014 | 0.093 | 0.979 |
Pf | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.008 |
Pg | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Ph | > 0.999 | 0.838 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Pi | > 0.999 | 0.975 | 0.050 | 0.054 |
Pj | > 0.999 | 0.975 | 0.061 | 0.054 |
T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; DR, diabetic retinopathy. Pa, P-value of control subjects versus T2DM samples. Pb, P-value of control subjects versus NPDR samples. Pc, P-value of control subjects versus PDR samples. Pd, P-value of control subjects versus DR samples. Pe, P-value of T2DM samples versus NPDR samples. Pf, P-value of T2DM samples versus PDR samples. Pg, P-value of T2DM samples versus DR samples. Ph, P-value of NPDR samples versus PDR samples. Pi, P-value of NPDR samples versus DR samples. Pj, P-value of PDR samples versus DR samples.