Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 8;9:930361. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.930361

TABLE 1.

Quality assessment of the studies included in the present systematic review.

Article Domain Score
Random sequence generation Appropriate randomization Blinding of participant or personnel Blinding of outcome assessor Withdrawal and dropout
Alizadeh et al. (2019) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Ansund et al. (2021) 1 1 0 0 1 3
Chang et al. (2020) 1 1 0 1 1 4
de Paulo et al. (2018) 1 0 0 0 1 2
Dieli-Conwright et al., 2018 1 1 0 0 1 3
Dieli-Conwright et al., 2018 bis 1 1 0 1 1 4
Dolan et al. (2010) 1 1 0 0 0 2
Fairey et al. (2003) 1 1 0 0 1 3
Guinan et al. (2013) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Hartman et al. (2019) 1 1 0 0 0 2
Hiensch et al. (2021) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Irwin et al. (2009) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Janelsins et al. (2011) 1 1 0 0 1 3
Jones et al. (2013) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Kim et al. (2017) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Kirkham et al., 2017 1 1 0 1 1 4
Lahart et al. (2016) 1 1 0 0 1 3
Lee et al. (2019) 1 1 0 0 1 3
Lee et al. (2020b) 1 1 0 0 1 3
Ligibel et al. (2008) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Mijwel et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Pagola et al. (2020) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Schmitz et al. (2005) 1 1 0 1 1 4
Sprod et al. (2012) 1 1 0 0 1 3

Points are awarded as follows: study described as randomized, 1 point; appropriate randomization, 1 point; subjects blinded to intervention, 1 point; evaluator blinded to intervention, 1 point; description of withdrawals and dropouts, 1 point.