Table 2.

Comparison of cell detection by different methods.

Methods	Cell line	TP	FN	FP	TPR	FPR
Proposed method	HUVEC	145	3.8	11	97.44%	7.39%
Proposed method	NIH-3T3	114.6	8	9.6	93.47%	7.83%
Average	HUVEC, NIH-3T3	129.3	5.9	10.3	95.65%	7.59%
Pan [30]	MC3T3-E1	30.6	8.9	3.4	89.95%	26.20%
Becattini [32]	CHO-K1, HEK	\	\	\	78.6%	18%