Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ind Med. 2009 May;52(5):391–407. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20686

Table V.

Proportionate Injury Ratio (PIR) Analyses of Livestock-Handling Injuries Among Cattle/Livestock Raisers Comparing Livestock-Handling Injuries to All Other Injuries by Operation Size, Gender, Age, and Experience

Livestock-handling Injuries (%) All other Injuries (%) Expected livestock-handling injuriesa PIRb (95% CI)
Operation Size
 Large 202 (20.2) 799 (79.8) 222 0.91 (0.79–1.05)
 Small 269 (23.1) 898 (76.9) 249 1.08 (0.95–1.22)
Gender
 Female 92 (28.6) 230 (71.4) 64 1.44 (1.16–1.77)*
 Male 379 (20.5) 1,467 (79.5) 407 0.93 (0.84–1.03)
Age**
 16–24 117 (21.8) 419 (78.2) 116 1.01 (0.83–1.21)
 25–34 129 (26.4) 360 (73.6) 100 1.29 (1.08–1.53)*
 35–44 97 (19.3) 406 (80.7) 113 0.86 (0.70–1.05)
 45–54 97 (23.3) 320 (76.7) 89 1.09 (0.89–1.33)
 55–64 24 (13.3) 156 (86.7) 43 0.55 (0.36–0.82)*
 65–79 7 (16.3) 36 (83.7) 10 0.70 (0.28–1.44)
Experience
 0–6 months 257 (18.9) 1,106 (81.1) 240 1.07 (0.94–1.21)
 6 months-2 years 86 (17.6) 402 (82.4) 87 0.98 (0.79–1.22)
 2–5 years 54 (16.0) 283 (84.0) 61 0.88 (0.66–1.15)
 5+ years 74 (16.4) 377 (83.6) 82 0.90 (0.71–1.13)
Total 471 (17.8) 1,697 (64.3)
a

Expected frequency for livestock-handling injuries by category if they had the same distribution by category as those for all other injuries.

b

The proportionate injury ratio (PIR) is calculated by dividing the observed livestock-handling injuries by expected livestock-handling injuries within a category.

*

Statisticallly significant (P-value < 0.05).

**

Statistically significant Mantel–Haenszel χ2 test for trend (P-value < 0.05).