Reviewer | Employment | Research grant | Other research support | Speakers’ bureau/honoraria | Expert witness | Ownership interest | Consultant/advisory board | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nada El Husseini | Duke University Medical Center | None | None | None | None | None | None | None |
Randi Foraker | Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine | None | None | None | None | None | None | None |
Bernhard Haring | Saarland University Hospital (Germany) | None | None | None | None | None | None | None |
Deepika Laddu | University of Illinois at Chicago | None | None | None | None | None | None | None |
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be significant if (1) the person receives $10 000 or more during any 12‐month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (2) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be modest if it is less than significant under the preceding definition.