Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 8;10(9):2223. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092223

Table 1.

Contemporary studies on endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Author Year Number of Patients Approach Ablative Energy Median Follow Up
(Months)
Upper Tract Recurrence
(%)
Progression to RNU
(%)
CSS OS
Nita et al. [22] 2012 65 Retrograde: 47
Percutaneous: 18
Nd: YAG 60.0 47.7 27.7
Vemana et al. [23] 2016 151 Retrograde/percutaneous Ho: YAG
Thu: YAG
43.0 53.0 5Y: 88%
Motamedinia et al. [24] 2016 141 Percutaneous Resection 66.0 35.0 14.0 NA LG: 126 months
HG: 59.6 months
Scotland et al. [25] 2018 80 Retrograde Ho: YAG
Nd: YAG
44.3 90.5 20.0 5Y 84.0% 5Y 75.0%
Musi et al. [27] 2018 42 Retrograde Thu: YAG 26.3 19.0 9.5
Defidio et al. [26] 2019 101 Retrograde Ho: YAG
Thu: YAG
28.7 30.7 8.9
Bozzini et al. [28] 2020 47 Retrograde Thu: YAG 11.7 19.2 NA
Scotland et al. [21] 2020 168 Retrograde Ho: YAG
Nd: YAG
66.0 71.4 29.8 5Y 92.6% 5Y 80.9%
Sanguedolce et al. [30] 2021 47 Retrograde: 45
Percutaneous: 2
Ho: YAG
Thu: YAG
24.0 28.3 17.0 Median 24.5 months Median 24 months

RNU, radical nephroureterectomy; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival; Nd, neodymium; YAG, yttrium-aluminum-garnet; Ho, holmium; Thu, thulium; NA, not applicable; LG, low grade; HG, high grade; 5Y, 5 years.