Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;29(9):6091–6114. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090479

Table 1.

A comparison of various surveillance modalities used for detecting colorectal dysplasia in patients with IBD.

Study Year IBD
Type
Type of
Endoscopy
Number of Patients Patients with
Dysplasia,
n (%)
Number of
Dysplasia
Number
of CRC
Patients
p Value Withdrawal
Time (Minutes)
Subramanian et al. [130] 2008–2010 IBD SD-WLE
HD-WLE
160 (UC101/CD59)
209 (UC147/CD62)
8 (5.00)
24 (11.48)
11 (HGD1)
32 (HGD2)
2
5
0.03 -
-
Marion et al. [131] 2005–2011 IBD SD-WLE
CE
68 (UC55/CD13) 11 (16.18)
27 (39.71)
11
27
-
-
0.001 -
-
Yang et al. [134] 2013–2015 UC HD-WLE
HD-CE
108
102
6 (5.56)
4 (3.92)
-
-
-
-
0.749 17.6
16.5
Alexandersson et al. [133] 2011–2016 IBD HD-WLE
HD-CE
153 (UC90/CD62/Indeterminate colitis1)
152 (UC96/CD54/Indeterminate colitis2)
7 (4.58)
17 (11.18)
7 (LGD5/HGD2)
24 (LGD21/HGD3)
0
0
0.032 17 ± 8
24 ± 11
Bisschops et al. [136] 2008–2013 UC CE
NBI
66
65
14 (21.21)
14 (21.54)
30 (LGD30)
20 (LGD19/HGD1)
0
1
0.964 27.0
18.5
Iacucci et al. [137] 2014–2016 IBD HD-WLE
CE
i-SCAN
90 (UC42/CD44/ Indeterminate colitis4)
90 (UC43/CD47/ Indeterminate colitis0)
90 (UC44/CD45/ Indeterminate colitis1)
23 (25.56)
22 (24.44)
14 (15.56)
22 (LGD22)
15 (LGD15)
11 (LGD11)
0
1
0
0.84 15.4
16.2
15.3
Vleugels et al. [139] 2013–2017 UC CE
AFI
105
105
20 (19.05)
13 (12.38)
37 (36LGD/1HGD)
14 (14LGD)
1
0
0.18 25.1
18.0
Kiesslich et al. [142] - UC SD-WLE
CLE
73
80
4 (5.48)
11 (13.75)
4 (3LGD/1HGD)
19 (12LGD/7HGD)
0
0
0.097 -
-
Leong et al. [149] 2014–2015 IBD FVC
FUSE
27 (UC15/CD12)
25 (UC14/CD11)
2
6
7
19
0
0
0.018 12.0
15.8

IBD: inflammatory bowel disease, UC: ulcerative colitis, CD: Crohn’s disease, HD-WLE: high-definition white-light endoscopy, SD-WLE: standard-definition white-light endoscopy, CE: chromoendoscopy, NBI: narrow band imaging, AFI: autofluorescence imaging, CLE: confocal laser endomicroscopy, FVC: forward-viewing colonoscopy, LGD: low-grade dysplasia, HGD: high-grade dysplasia.