Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 7;14(5):675–685. doi: 10.3390/idr14050073

Table 2.

The primary and secondary outcomes according to SHR tertiles.

Total
(n = 395)
SHR 1st Tertile SHR 2nd Tertile SHR 3rd Tertile p Value a p Value b
Admission scale c
3
4
5
61 (15.4)
329 (83.3)
5 (1.3)
21 (16)
107 (81.7)
3 (2.3)
20 (14.6)
115 (83.9)
2 (1.5)
20 (15.7)
107 (84.3)
0 (0)
Primary outcome d 118 (29.9) 34 (26) 37 (27) 47 (37) 0.038 0.054
Clinical deterioration e 104 (26.3) 30 (22.9) 34 (24.8) 40 (31.5) 0.121 0.227
IMV 102 (25.8) 30 (22.9) 32 (23.4) 40 (31.5) 0.121 0.138
ICU 118 (29.9) 34 (26) 37 (27) 47 (37) 0.038 0.054
In-hospital mortality 69 (17.5) 20 (15.3) 22 (16.1) 27 (21.3) 0.212 0.227

ap value when 3rd tertile was compared to 1st tertile. b p value when 3rd tertile was compared to 2nd tertile. c Grades of the ordinal scale: [3] hospitalized with no oxygen therapy; [4] hospitalized and required oxygen by mask or nasal prongs; [5] hospitalized and required high flow oxygen therapy (HFNC or NIV). d The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of ICU admission, IMV, and 28-day in-hospital mortality. e Clinical deterioration was defined as an increase in the admission ordinal scale ≥ 2 steps. Abbreviations: HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; ICU, intensive care unit; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; NIV, noninvasive ventilation; SHR, stress hyperglycemia ratio. Note: All variables were expressed as frequencies and (%).