Table 3.
Continuation on Included Studies Characteristics
| Study ID | Device | Software | Method | Parameters | r n | Min r | Max r | ICC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inter | Intra | ||||||||
| 1 | 3D Accuitomo | iDixel | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 1 | - | −0.54 | - | - |
| 2 | Galileos | - | M | Kvaal Method | 7 | 0.69 | 0.86 | - | - |
| 3 | Galileos | Galileos Viewer | M | Pulp Dentine Ratio | 3 | −0.84 | −0.85 | 0.976 | 0.993 |
| 4 | PlanMeca | ITK-SNAP 3.8 | V | Pulp Chamber Volume | 6 | −0.69 | −0.82 | 0.917 | 0.979 |
| 5 | Kodak 9000 | KODAK Dental Imaging Software 6.8 | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 1 | - | 0.42 | - | - |
| 6 | Scanora 3D | OnDemand 3D | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 1 | - | −0.76 | 0.99 | - |
| 7 | Cranex 3D | ITK-SNAP 3.8 | V | Pulp Chamber Crown Ratio | 4 | −0.90 | −0.96 | - | - |
| 8 | PlanMeca | MIMICS 21.0 | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 6 | −0.67 | −0.88 | 0.989 | 0.973 |
| 9 | NewTom VG | MIMICS 10.01 | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 13 | 0.53 | 0.85 | - | - |
| 10 | Promax 3D | - | M | Tooth Coronal Index | 1 | - | −0.65 | 0,592–0,730 | - |
| 11 | Cranex 3D | OnDemand 3D | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 24 | −0.16 | −0.61 | - | 0.94 |
| 12 | Promax 3D | Planmeca Romexis 2.3.1 .R | V | Pulp Crown Ratio | 3 | −0.40 | −0.60 | - | 0,63–0,83 |
| 13 | Kodak 9000-3D; i-CAT | OSIRIX | M | Kvaal Method | 41 | −0.21 | −0.65 | - | - |
| 14 | i-CAT | i-CAT Vision | S | Gustafson Method modified by Olze | 4 | 0.44 | 0.62 | - | - |
| 15 | i-CAT | MIMICS | M | Open Apices Surface Area | 1 | - | −0.92 | - | 0.9 |
| 16 | - | OnDemand 3D | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 1 | - | −0.52 | - | 0,91–0,93 |
| 17 | - | Planmeca Romexis | S | Demirjian | 5 | 0.48 | 0.56 | - | - |
| 18 | Scanora 3D | OnDemand 3D | M | Tooth Coronal Index | 2 | −0.09 | −0.18 | - | - |
| 19 | Kodak CS9300 | 3D DOCTOR | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 6 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0,81–0,9 | 0,85–0,93 |
| 20 | Cranex 3D | OnDemand 3D | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 16 | −0.33 | −0.76 | - | - |
| 21 | KODAK K9500 | ITK-SNAP 3.4 | V | Pulp Volume | 2 | −0.87 | −0.88 | 0,994–0,9998 | 0,994–1 |
| 22 | Cranex 3D | OnDemand 3D | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 8 | −0.16 | −0.78 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| 23 | Promax 3D | Planmeca Romexis | V | Pulp Volume | 2 | −0.51 | −0.51 | 0,912–0,965 | 0,945–0,995 |
| 24 | i-CAT | MIMICS | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 6 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.968 | 0.945 |
| 25 | Promax 3D | Planmeca Romexis | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 2 | −0.64 | −0.66 | 0,8–0,9 | 0.9 |
| 26 | Scanora 3D | Simplant Pro | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 12 | −0.24 | −0.88 | - | - |
| 27 | - | - | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 1 | - | −0.36 | - | 0,85–0,87 |
| 28 | i-CAT | OSIRIX | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 3 | −0.51 | −0.70 | - | - |
| 29 | Promax 3D | 3D DOCTOR | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 1 | - | −0.49 | - | - |
| M | Kvaal Method | 1 | - | −0.33 | - | - | |||
| 30 | Promax 3D | MIMICS | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 6 | −0.78 | 0.81 | 0,932–0,975 | 0,946–0,987 |
| 31 | i-CAT | MIMICS | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 2 | −0.80 | −0.88 | 0.982 | 0.914 |
| 32 | Pax-Zenith 3D | “Open Source” | V | Pulp Enamel Ratio | 3 | −0.63 | −0.69 | 0.856 | 0,911–0,937 |
| 33 | Vatech | ITK-SNAP 3.6 | V | Pulp Chamber Volume | 2 | −0.98 | −0.99 | - | - |
| 34 | i-CAT NG | i-CAT Workstation; DentalSlice | V | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 2 | −0.39 | −0.55 | - | - |
| 35 | i-CAT | MIMICS 21.0; 3-Matics | M | Open Apices Surface Area | 4 | −0.97 | −0.98 | 0.902 | 0.931 |
| 36 | NewTom 5G XL | NNT | M | Cameriere Open Apices Ratio | 0 | - | - | 0,711–0,981 | 0,798–0,988 |
| 37 | i-CAT | inVivo 5 | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 1 | - | −0.62 | - | 0.869 |
| 38 | - | OnDemand 3D | M | Pulp Tooth Ratio | 3 | −0.60 | −0.73 | - | - |
| 39 | CB MercuRay | Anatomage | A | London Atlas | - | - | - | - | - |
A, Atlas; ICC, Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient for Inter-and Intra-observer; M, Metric; Max r, Maximum r value reported; Min r, Minimum r value reported; S, Staging; V, Volumetric; r n, Number of correlation coefficient (r) reported.
Study ID corresponds with Table 2.