Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;119(38):e2208337119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208337119

Table 1.

Model parameters

Symbol Description Value Source*
a, b  Length, width of C2B domain 5 nm, 3 nm (43)
c0 Monolayer spontaneous curvature (40% PS, 60% PC) 0.02 nm−1 (A)
dh Hydrophobic interaction length 2 nm (60, 61)
Eh0 Monolayer-carbon support hydrophobic energy density 0.04 kT/nm2 (B)
ϵsyt-ATP Syt-ATP binding energy 9.7 kT (C)
ϵsyt-mono Syt-monolayer binding energy 18 kT (D)
ϵsyt-pm Syt-planar-membrane binding energy 4.9 kT (D)
ϵsyt-syt Syt-Syt binding energy 9.5 kT (E)
ϵsyt-ves Syt-synaptic-vesicle binding energy 2.2 kT (D)
lp Persistence length of Syt oligomer 170 nm (F)
Rbead Radius of model beads 1.5 nm (G)
Rves Vesicle radius 20 nm
R0 Spontaneous radius of curvature of Syt oligomers 13 nm (F)
κ Bending modulus of monolayer (bilayer) 12.5 kT (25 kT) (H)
γ Bilayer membrane tension 0.003 pN/nm (79, 80)
η Viscosity of water 103 Pa·s
ηm 2D viscosity of lipid bilayers 3×109 Pa·s·m (81)
λ Debye length at 140 mM salt 0.7 nm (66)

*(A) Linear interpolation of spontaneous curvatures of DOPS (0.07 nm1 (82)) and DOPC (0.02 nm1 (83)), based on the molar fractions of the two components. (B) Deduced in the present work (see Fig. 3 C and D). (C) Experimentally measured in the present work. (D) Calculated in the present work, using measurements of ref. 6 as input. (E) Calculated in the present work, using measurements of ref. 46 as input. (F) Calculated in the present work by fitting Eq. 1 to the experimentally measured Syt ring size distribution in bulk solution (Fig. 2A). (G) Estimated from the C2AB crystal structure (Fig. 1B). (H) Bilayer bending modulus from ref. 84, measured in 100 mM NaCl. Monolayer modulus is assumed half the bilayer value.