Abstract
Mifepristone is a progesterone and glucocorticoid receptor antagonist. Medical abortion with mifepristone and prostaglandin has revolutionized the abortion process extending abortion care to the doors of females. From as low as 2 mg/day to doses extending to 600 mg, from daily dosing to single dosage treatment, mifepristone has a wide perspective in the treatment of various pathologies. Cervical dilatation and myometrial contractility have made the utility of mifepristone feasible for second-trimester termination of pregnancy and induction of labor awaiting Food and Drug Administration approvals. Its anti-progesterone action on the menstrual cycle has a new dimension of use as a contraceptive, as well as use as a menstruation inductive agent. Its role in endometriosis, ectopic pregnancy, and adenomyosis requires more intensive research. Apoptotic action of mifepristone, interference of heterotypic cell adhesion to the basement membrane, cell migration, growth inhibition of various cancer cell lines, decreased epidermal growth factor expression, suppression of invasive and metastatic cancer potential, increase in tumor necrosis factor, downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2, B-cell lymphoma 2, and Nuclear factor kappa B have opened its potential to be explored as anti-cancer treatment and its effects on leiomyoma. The drug needs to be studied more for the prospectus of its anti-glucocorticoid actions in a wider dimension beyond its acquiescence for the treatment of Cushing syndrome.
Keywords: cushing disease, cushing syndrome, meningioma, leiomyoma, medical termination of pregnancy, abortion, mifepristone
Introduction and background
Mifepristone, a synthetic steroid, is an antagonist to glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors. At low doses, mifepristone binds to the intracellular progesterone receptor. At high doses, it blocks the glucocorticoid receptor affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and increasing circulating cortisol. Mifepristone has a higher affinity for the glucocorticoid II receptor than it does for the glucocorticoid I receptor [1].
Historically, the discovery of the compound RU 486, i.e., mifepristone is attributed to the search and investigation of a compound that would block glucocorticoid receptors. It was noticed that the compound was strongly bound to the identical progesterone receptors. This study further led to the evolution of the drug mifepristone and its introduction as an abortifacient due to its effect on the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy in 1982 [2]. A clinical study on mifepristone was conducted in 1984-1986. In France in 1988 and Britain in 1991, mifepristone was approved for clinical use in abortion. Later, in 1999, it was approved for clinical use in abortion in 10 European countries and Israel. Then, in 1992, mifepristone was approved for clinical use in China, and in 2000 in the United States [3,4] for abortion.
Slow metabolic clearance of mifepristone favors a single dose administration in the medical termination of pregnancy. The metabolic clearance rate of mifepristone is 30 L/day, and it has a half-life of 20 hours [5]. A low dose of mifepristone acts on the endometrial milieu but does not inhibit ovulation, and this action is attributed to its post-coital contraceptive action. High doses of up to 1,200 mg/day are used in Cushing syndrome. However, much higher doses in some cases have been linked to cholestatic liver disease.
Owing to its anti-progesterone and anti-glucocorticoid action, mifepristone has found wide clinical application. Not all applications are approved and require further high-grade randomized studies. Those with unsatisfactory results for a particular disease have opened a dimension of study for chemically similar drugs from the same chain. This review aims to discuss and focus on the possible wider utility of the drug which needs to be strengthened with better clinical evidence.
Review
Methodology
An extensive review of the literature was done using PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term mifepristone. Studies and articles focusing on the clinical utility of mifepristone were included in this narrative review.
Obstetric and gynecological uses of mifepristone
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications of mifepristone are early pregnancy termination combined with misoprostol and the treatment of hyperglycemia in Cushing syndrome [1]. In the following, we discuss the various uses of mifepristone that are approved and those that have potential application after future research [6].
Early Pregnancy Termination
Mifepristone decreases estrogen and progesterone receptors in decidua by acting as a competitive receptor antagonist of progesterone [7]. This is the probably attributable mechanism of action to the termination of pregnancy. Because mifepristone alone for the treatment of abortion has a success rate of 80%, small doses of uterotonic agents after mifepristone treatment is the preferred regimen in an attempt to increase complete abortion rates [8,9]. The lack of response could be due to an inadequate increase in either endogenous accumulation of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) or in uterine contractility which is subsequently overcome by the use of prostaglandins [10]. The FDA-approved regimen (2016) for early termination of pregnancy is mifepristone with misoprostol in pregnancy with 70 days or less since the first day of a woman’s last menstrual period. The approved mifepristone dosing regimen is 200 mg of mifepristone taken by mouth on day one, followed by 800 µg of misoprostol taken buccally after 24-48 hours. Follow-up with the healthcare provider is done about seven to fourteen days after taking mifepristone.
The mifepristone-misoprostol regimen in the late first trimester (>70 to ≤84-day gestation) is not FDA-approved compared with surgical abortion, which is effective and safer in the late first trimester (94.6% versus 97.9% complete abortion) and more effective than misoprostol alone (90.4 versus 81.6% complete abortion). Complete success rates are higher with repeat dosing of misoprostol [11].
Medical abortion with sequential administration of mifepristone and prostaglandin is a safe, effective, well-tolerated, and acceptable method of termination of early first-trimester pregnancy. The introduction of the mifepristone drug for abortion has introduced abortion care to the doorsteps of women. Especially in low and middle-income groups of countries where inpatient healthcare facilities are scarce in remote places and surgical treatment of medical termination of pregnancy may require more human resources and capacity building of healthcare logistics, mifepristone treatment, which is given as outpatient treatment for abortion, is revolutionary and a boon. The major side effect of this regimen is gastrointestinal and is commonly related to prostaglandin analog; however, these are self-limiting. The latent period to the end result of abortion after mifepristone ingestion has raised a new concern requiring the investigation of the safety of the drug for the fetus of the mother who is set back from subsequent misoprostol ingestion and alters the abortion decision. After the intake of mifepristone, if the woman intends to continue the pregnancy, expectant management and fetal surveillance are done. However, studies now suggest that continuing pregnancy is more common with lower mifepristone doses and advanced gestational age. About 67% of women after mifepristone ingestion continue their pregnancy to term [12].
Second-Trimester Termination of Pregnancy
Mifepristone has been studied for its use in second-trimester termination of pregnancy with promising results in combination with misoprostol and, less commonly, oxytocin. Second-trimester termination of pregnancy can be done both medically and surgically. Induced abortion with a mifepristone and misoprostol regimen is the preferred approach; where mifepristone is not available, misoprostol alone for medical abortion can also be effective over dilation and evacuation (D&E), contributing significantly to safety [13]. Mifepristone followed by an oxytocin regimen has a long time until expulsion but has fewer side effects compared to the mifepristone-misoprostol regime [14]. Administering mifepristone and misoprostol simultaneously over the sequential dosing protocol results in lower expulsion rates within 24 hours of taking misoprostol, longer median misoprostol treatment times, and requires higher misoprostol doses. Both regimens work equally effectively at 48 hours. Simultaneous dosing results in less total time from the first clinical contact to complete abortion. Other methods used in second-trimester abortion are a combination of prostaglandin and hygroscopic dilator combination, namely, sulprostone and Dilapan. Significantly shorter hospitalization stays and short treatment to abortion intervals in patients treated with mifepristone and misoprostol compared to sulprostone and Dilapan treatment have been observed [15].
Missed Abortion and Fetal Demise
Mifepristone is as effective as other conventional methods in the termination of pregnancy in case of fetal demise in all gestational ages. Treatment with mifepristone plus misoprostol has a higher success rate and is more cost-effective than misoprostol alone in the management of missed miscarriages [16-18]. It is used to induce labor after intrauterine fetal demise. Various studies have found mifepristone-misoprostol to be more effective than misoprostol alone in 14-28-week gestational fetal death [19,20]. Short induction to the delivery time and higher success rate have been noted with the mifepristone group compared to misoprostol alone with intrauterine fetal demise over 28 weeks of gestation [21].
Menstrual Induction
Menstrual induction refers to early uterine evacuation without laboratory confirmation of pregnancy in women with delayed menses usually up to 10 days after the expected date. Mifepristone may hold promise for “menstrual regulation” and induction in case of missed dates of the period for women who do not have access to medical confirmation of pregnancy and for women who do not want to determine pregnancy. Various doses (150 mg, followed by misoprostol, 600 mg single dose) have been studied with promising results [22-24].
Emergency Contraception
Progesterone receptor antagonists such as mifepristone, selective progesterone receptor modulators such as ulipristal, and selective estrogen receptor modulators such as centchroman are the newly emerging drugs in emergency contraception. The mechanism of action of mifepristone depends on the timing of the administration in the menstrual cycle [25]. After the dominant follicle is developed, during the follicular phase, mifepristone delays the rise in estrogen, luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, ovulation, and subsequent follicular and endometrial development. These effects of mifepristone ultimately lead to the inhibition of ovulation [25,26]. If taken after ovulation, mifepristone inhibits endometrial development and blocks the expression of necessary endometrial receptors. The endometrium remains immature, thus preventing implantation from effectively occurring [25-28]. Both low‐dose mifepristone (less than 25 mg) and mid‐dose mifepristone (25-50 mg) within 120 hours of unprotected intercourse are associated with fewer pregnancies than levonorgestrel and Yuzpe [29].
Estrogen-Free Contraceptive Pill
Given in the first three days of the menstrual cycle, mifepristone does not affect the cycle, length of the follicular phase, LH surge, or luteal phase duration. Daily doses between 2 and 5 mg inhibit ovulation and menstruation in over 90% of cycles while maintaining follicular development and estradiol levels within the range found during the follicular phase with the endometrium showing down-regulation of progesterone receptors (PR). The antiproliferative effect of mifepristone is reassuring suggesting that the risk of atypical hyperplasia due to the effect of prolonged exposure to estrogen unopposed by progesterone is low. This safety spectrum by mifepristone is an impetus for future studies [30-34]. Owing to the failure rate of 17-19%, in addition to low efficacy and its limitation such as the disruption of cycle rhythm, its use is not popular. However, higher doses are more effective and need further good-quality randomized studies to testify to its efficacy to recommend its clinical use. A 200 mg mifepristone tablet on the 16th day of the menstrual cycle as a monthly pill has been found to have a high success rate and better acceptance rate in educated females [35]. Once weekly administration with 25 mg of mifepristone is also a potentially effective method for regular contraception [36].
Cervical Dilatation
Mifepristone is useful for the preoperative preparation of women for surgical abortion in the late first-trimester and second-trimester pretreatment because of its marked effect on cervical dilatation and myometrial contractility. It reduces the interval between expulsion and prostaglandin administration. However, the findings regarding the use of mifepristone in preoperative hysteroscopy patients for cervical dilatation are not consistent and promising [37-39].
Induction of Labor
Mifepristone is efficient in inducing labor in term pregnancy. There are no significant adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes between mifepristone use and expectant management. However, more painful uterine contractions and a higher rate of cephalopelvic disproportion have been directly related to the mifepristone action in some studies requiring further verification [40,41]. A higher success rate with mifepristone and fewer chances of failure of induction with mifepristone that leads to cesarean section justify its future trial for use in induction of labor [42].
Ectopic Pregnancy
A recent meta-analysis of 23 randomized studies involving 1,706 patients concluded that a combination of mifepristone and methotrexate results in better outcomes of ectopic pregnancy [43]. A combination of methotrexate and mifepristone increases the success rate, especially if the progesterone level is higher [44,45]. However, this conclusion needs further verification by randomized, double-blind, and controlled trials with larger sample sizes and more rigorous trial designs.
Endometriosis
As an antiprogesterone, mifepristone causes upregulation of endometrial androgen receptors in both glandular and stromal cells, and this has an antiproliferative and antiestrogenic effect that inhibits estradiol-stimulated endometrial growth. This is the probable mechanism of action of mifepristone in endometriosis treatment. Studies conducted to date show some relief of symptoms with mifepristone. Pelvic pain is improved with a low dose of 5 mg mifepristone for three months. However, no change in the extent of the disease has been noted on follow-up laparoscopy at such low doses. A dose of 50 mg of mifepristone for six months demonstrates a significant regression in visible endometriotic lesions in follow-up laparoscopy and a decrease in clinical symptoms [46-48].
Leiomyoma
Mifepristone antagonizes the action of progesterone required for the maintenance and proliferation of leiomyomas [49]. Progesterone mediates the growth of fibroids by B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) induction [50]. Mifepristone reduces BCL-2, decreases epidermal growth factor (EGF) expression in fibroids, and increases tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and androgen receptors [51]. A size reduction may be due to its direct effect on PRs. Following mifepristone treatment in leiomyoma, amenorrhoea ensues because of ovulation inhibition. Repressing the effect on endometrial vasculature and stromal vascular endothelial growth factor decreases menstrual blood loss [52-55]. Mifepristone therapy with 25 mg daily is the recommended dosing. In a trial with a 25 mg dosage, there was a 49% reduction in tumor volume after three months in uterine leiomyoma [56]. Another study concluded that there is a 90% reduction in menstrual blood loss with both 10 and 25 mg of mifepristone for three months in fibroid patients. However, a 25 mg dose has a significantly greater reduction in the size of myoma than 10 mg with no endometrial atypia [55]. For patients who want to avoid surgery, at a young age, in premenopausal patients, as well as an adjunct to surgery for size reduction, mifepristone is a good choice. However, the notable adverse effect was the development of benign endometrial hyperplasia due to prolonged unopposed estrogen milieu [57].
Adenomyosis
Mifepristone causes cell cycle arrest by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and CDK2 expressions and induces cell apoptosis via the mitochondria-dependent signaling pathway and increased expression of caspase 3 in endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells of adenomyosis. A decrease in C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) expression restricts the invasion of endometrial cells via the suppression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. It restricts the migration of endometrial and stromal cells in adenomyosis. Therefore mifepristone can effectively inhibit the emergence and development of adenomyosis, decrease the uterine volume and cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) concentration, and increases the hemoglobin concentration in serum for adenomyosis patients [58,59]. In an interventional study of 20 adenomyosis patients on mifepristone 5 mg/day, there was significant relief concerning dysmenorrhea. The immunohistochemistry of these patients after treatment with mifepristone showed reduced secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and TNF-α from endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, restricted infiltration, and degranulation of mast cells in eutopic and ectopic endometrium, as well as decreased density of nerve fibers by inhibiting the migration capacity of nerve cells in adenomyosis [60].
Breakthrough Bleeding in Levonorgestrel and Depot Medroxyprogesterone
In a study by John et al., a 50 mg dose of mifepristone administered every two weeks decreased the incidence of breakthrough bleeding (BTB) in new starters of depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA). This effect may be attributed to the modulation of endometrial estrogen and progesterone receptors [61,62]. Mifepristone as pretreatment is effective in reducing the number of episodes and duration of intermenstrual bleeding/spotting in levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) users, given at a dose of 100 mg every 30 days for three months. In a study with a 25 mg daily dosage of mifepristone, there was a significant reduction in bleeding and spotting days [63,64]. Hence, mifepristone use is promising in the prevention of BTB in DMPA and LNG users. However, the further scope of study in determining the optimum dose, schedule, and duration needs to be emphasized.
Premature Luteinizing Hormone Surges Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in In Vitro Fertilization
A single dose of mifepristone administered during the preovulatory phase of the cycle delays the LH surge and postpones ovulation [65]. Cycles with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation are associated with high early luteal progesterone levels and advanced endometrial histology. Low doses of mifepristone may correct precocious luteinization and restore endometrial receptivity. However, with further research, the dose of mifepristone needs to be standardized [66,67]. Various dosages (40 mg daily or 2.5 mg for two doses) and timing schedules (depending upon the COH protocol used, continuous administration from day two with follicle-stimulating hormone or after follicle aspiration and on the following day) for its efficacy needs to be studied ahead. Table 1 shows the obstetric and gynecological uses of mifepristone.
Table 1. Obstetric and gynecological uses of mifepristone.
Obstetric and gynecological uses | Indications | Recommended doses |
FDA-approved use | ||
1 | Early pregnancy termination | Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1, misoprostol 800 µg buccally after 24-48 hours |
Proposed uses | ||
1 | Second-trimester termination of pregnancy | Mifepristone 200 mg orally, followed by misoprostol 200 μg vaginally 3 hourly [15] |
2 | Missed abortion and fetal demise | 600 mg/day for 2 days [19]; 200 mg orally with misoprostol (14-28 weeks of gestation) [20] |
3 | Menstrual induction | Mifepristone 600 mg single dose [22]; mifepristone 150 mg, misoprostol 0.4 mg vaginally after 2 days [24] |
4 | Emergency contraception | Less than 25 mg single dose [29]; 25-50 mg single dose [29] |
5 | Estrogen-free contraceptive pill | 2 and 5 mg daily [30]; 25 mg once weekly [36]; 200 mg once a month on the 16th day of the menstrual cycle [35] |
6 | Cervical dilatation | 600 mg orally single dose [39] |
7 | Induction of labor | 200 mg single dose [42] |
8 | Ectopic pregnancy | Methotrexate 50 mg/m2 intramuscularly and mifepristone 600 mg orally [44,45] |
9 | Endometriosis | 50 and 100 mg daily for 6 months [46]; 50 mg for 6 months [47] |
10 | Leiomyomas | 10-25 mg daily for 3 months [55] |
11 | Adenomyosis | 5 mg daily [60] |
12 | Breakthrough bleeding in LNG and DMPA | 50 mg every 2 weeks for 24 weeks [61]; 100 mg every 30 days for 3 months [63] |
13 | Premature LH surges undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF | 2.5 mg two doses after follicle aspiration [66]; 40 mg daily [67] |
Non-gynecological uses of mifepristone
Cushing Syndrome
Mifepristone alone is approved as a therapy for Cushing syndrome to control hyperglycemia in patients who are not candidates for surgical treatment or have not achieved remission from surgery for oral once-a-day administration [6,68-70]. Mifepristone is an effective treatment option in endogenous hypercortisolism, where monitoring and specific clinical considerations will benefit the patient. Mifepristone is started at an initial dose of 300 mg once a day orally, which can be increased up to 300 mg every fortnight to a maximum dose of 1,200 mg per day for the treatment of Cushing syndrome. Symptoms of cortisol withdrawal, hypokalemia, and change in thyroid function effects related to its antiprogesterone activity and rash require special consideration [71]. High-dose and prolonged use of mifepristone in Cushing syndrome brings about a concern about the adverse effects (Figure 1), which require good monitoring and patient care. In any condition that requires prolonged high-dose treatment of mifepristone, these adverse effects should be kept in mind and necessary precautions should be taken.
Insulin Resistance and Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity
Short-term mifepristone administration improves adipose and hepatic insulin sensitivity in obese individuals with hyperglycemia without hypercortisolism [72]. It is a possible remedy to be studied for metabolic syndrome.
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Prostatic Cancer
Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer with glucocorticoid receptor (GR) overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. GR antagonist with chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel dose of 100 mg/m2 plus mifepristone 300 mg) helps to manage the toxicity of the former [73]. Mifepristone suppresses triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell growth by inhibiting KLF5 expression via inducing miR-153. However, even at high doses, it has limited anticancer efficacy. To enhance the anticancer activities, a targeted compound chain containing 17 compounds is being designed and synthesized by altering the sensitive metabolic region of mifepristone [74]. Genetic deletion of the PR or its blockade by mifepristone-like progesterone antagonists effectively suppresses the development of high-grade squamous carcinoma (HGSC) of the ovary and its peritoneal metastases. Mifepristone treatment has been found to improve the survival rate in mice with HGSC. Hence, in women carrying a deleterious mutation in the BRCA gene, mifepristone can have a potential role [75,76]. Glucocorticoid and androgen receptor antagonist combination, mifepristone, and enzalutamide are safe and well tolerated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but they do not result in PSA progression-free survival (PFS), with radiographic PFS, and PSA response rate (RR) earlier to monotherapy with enzalutamide. The development of more specific GR antagonists combined with AR antagonists, potentially studied in an earlier disease state, should be explored [77].
Meningioma
Owing to the antiprogestational activity of mifepristone, it is used as monotherapy for PR-positive benign central nervous system tumors, such as meningioma, at a dose of 200 mg/day. Usually, the long-term treatments are well tolerated; however, endometrial hyperplasia in some patients is noted and requires histological evaluation. Biochemical hypothyroidism is commonly associated with long-term mifepristone therapy in meningioma and requires periodic thyroid function screening [78-83].
Uveal Melanoma, Glaucoma, and Chorioretinopathy
In a study, Prisca et al. [84] reported that mifepristone impedes the proliferation of uveal melanoma cells in a concentration-dependent manner. More studies are required to determine the effects. Topical mifepristone preparation is being evaluated for the treatment of corticosteroid-induced intraocular pressure [85-87].
Psychiatric Diseases
Dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and high cortisol levels have been implicated in mood, psychotic, and other psychiatric disorders. Mifepristone is a potent GR antagonist. Mifepristone blocks the cortisol feedback mechanism and raises circulating cortisol levels. Mifepristone blocks GR in key brain regions and monoaminergic nuclei, resulting in symptomatic and cognitive improvement. It has been found beneficial in the treatment of psychotic depression, cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, alcohol and cocaine dependence [88,89], posttraumatic stress disorder, weight gain associated with the use of antipsychotic drugs such as olanzapine [90-92], and Alzheimer’s disease [93] at doses of 600 mg to 1,800 mg per day. Table 2 describes the various non-gynecological uses of mifepristone.
Table 2. Non-gynecological uses of mifepristone.
Non-gynecological uses | Author | Type of study | Study details | Conclusions |
Cushing syndrome | Morgan and Laufgraben [68] | Review of therapeutics | The article reviews the role of mifepristone in CS treatment | Mifepristone is recommended for CS to control hyperglycemia and those who are not candidates for surgical treatment. The recommended starting dosage is 300 mg/day. Maximum dosage is 1,200 mg/day |
Fleseriu et al. [69] | Clinical trial | 50 adults with endogenous CS and associated type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired glucose tolerance (C-DM) or a diagnosis of hypertension (C-HT) | In C-DM: Significant decrease in HbA1c, decrease in fasting plasma glucose. In C-HT: Improvement in DBP, decreased waist circumference, and mean weight change | |
Katznelson et al. [70] | Clinical trial | 46 adult patients with refractory CS along with type 2 DM or impaired glucose tolerance, and/or a diagnosis of hypertension | 88% of patients had clinically significant improvement at 24 weeks | |
Insulin sensitivity and resistance | Gubbi et al. [72] | Randomized controlled trial | 16 overweight individuals with pre-diabetes or mild type 2 DM but not clinical hypercortisolism studied | Short-term mifepristone administration improves adipose and hepatic insulin sensitivity among obese individuals with hyperglycemia without hypercortisolism by GR blockade |
Cancer | Nanda et al. [73] | Randomized controlled trial | Nine patients were enrolled. Patients were randomized to placebo or mifepristone for the first cycle; mifepristone was given to all for subsequent cycles | Immunohistochemical staining for GR found six of nine tumors were GR-positive. All six GR-positive tumors were triple-negative at the time of recurrence. Of these six patients, two had a complete response, two had partial responses, one had stable disease, and one had progressive disease. GR inhibition by mifepristone plus chemotherapy produces manageable toxicity |
Liu et al. [74] | An experimental study (cell line study) | A compound library containing 17 compounds by altering the sensitive metabolic region of mifepristone is studied for the treatment of TNBC cell lines | FZU-00,003 displayed the most potent efficiency | |
Kim et al. [75] | An experimental study (mouse model) | Mouse model of ovarian cancer that mimics the clinical metastases of human high-grade serous carcinoma | An effective chemopreventive strategy in the BRCA gene mutation for ovarian cancer and by extension breast cancer | |
Goyeneche et al. [76] | An experimental study (cell line and animal study) | Ovarian cancer cell lines of different genetic backgrounds (SK-OV-3, Caov-3, OV2008, and IGROV-1) | In vitro, mifepristone inhibited ovarian cancer cell proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In vivo, mifepristone significantly delayed the growth of ovarian carcinoma xenografts in a dose-dependent manner | |
Serritella et al. [77] | Clinical trial | 106 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer | Enzalutamide combined with mifepristone was safe and well-tolerated but did not meet its endpoint | |
Meningioma | Ji et al. [81] | Randomized controlled trial | 164 eligible patients, 80 were randomly assigned to mifepristone and 84 to placebo | Twenty-four patients (30%) were able to complete 2 years of mifepristone without disease progression. There was no statistical difference in failure-free or overall survival |
Llaguno-Munive et al. [83] | An experimental trial (animal study) | Wistar rats were studied after orthotopically implanting C6 glioma cells | Mifepristone could act as a chemosensitizing agent for temozolomide during chemotherapy for GBM | |
Ocular pathology | ||||
Uveal melanoma | Alvarez et al. [84] | An experimental study (cell lines) | In vitro, uveal melanoma cells were incubated with mifepristone for up 72 hours | Mifepristone inhibits functionality, growth capacity, and viability of human primary and metastatic uveal melanoma cell lines in a concentration-related manner |
Glaucoma | Green et al. [86] | An experimental study (animal study) | Topically administered mifepristone | Mifepristone alone reduced IOP relative to controls and the further addition of medrysone (progesterone) at 14 days did not affect IOP. Mifepristone is an effective antagonist against progesterone’s effects on IOP |
Green et al. [87] | An experimental study (animal study) | Topical dexamethasone interaction with mifepristone | Mifepristone caused a lower intraocular pressure than seen in other groups, whether in the presence or absence of dexamethasone | |
Psychiatric diseases | ||||
Depression | Flores et al. [88] | Randomized controlled trial | 30 patients’ data were analyzed. 15 were randomized to placebo, and 15 were randomized to mifepristone for 8 days | Short-term use of mifepristone may be effective in the treatment of psychotic major depression and may re-regulate the HPA axis |
Alcohol dependence and withdrawal | Khom et al. [89] | An experimental study (animal study) | 67 adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats with alcohol vapor dependence | Mifepristone decreased GABA release with the largest effect in dependent rats |
Olanzapine-induced weight gain | Beebe et al. [90] | An experimental study (animal study) | Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats grouped to olanzapine and mifepristone | Results suggest that mifepristone, a potent glucocorticoid antagonist, may both reduce and prevent olanzapine-induced weight gain in rats |
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) | Belanoff et al. [93] | Clinical trial | The rate of cognitive decline is compared in AD subjects randomized to receive 200 mg of mifepristone daily for 6 months or a placebo | Mifepristone decelerated the rate of cortisol-related cognitive decline in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD |
Conclusions
At present, the most popular use of mifepristone is for medical abortion because of its effectiveness and safety. Its effective use in other indications in obstetrics, gynecology, oncology, and endocrinology needs further evaluation, although the present study has shown some encouraging results which would bring increased access to various dosage formulations and options for healthcare globally.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- 1.Autry BM, Wadhwa R. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Mifepristone. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.[The effects of an antiprogesterone steroid in women: interruption of the menstrual cycle and of early pregnancy] Herrmann W, Wyss R, Riondel A, Philibert D, Teutsch G, Sakiz E, Baulieu EE. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6814714/ C R Seances Acad Sci III. 1982;294:933–938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.RU 486 in France and England: corporate ethics and compulsory licensing. Boland R. Law Med Health Care. 1992;20:226–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01194.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.RU486: the French experience. Ulmann A, Silvestre L. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:126–130. doi: 10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.A novel approach to human fertility control: contragestion by the anti-progesterone RU 486. Baulieu EE. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1988;28:125–129. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(88)90089-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mifepristone: bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and use-effectiveness. Sarkar NN. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101:113–120. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00522-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.The effects of an antiprogestin, mifepristone, and an antiestrogen, tamoxifen, on endometrial 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and progestin and estrogen receptors during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: an immunohistochemical study. Mäentausta O, Svalander P, Danielsson KG, Bygdeman M, Vihko R. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:913–918. doi: 10.1210/jcem.77.4.8408465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Swahn ML. Reproductive Biology. Boston, MA: Springer; 1985. Pharmacokinetic and clinical studies of RU 486 for fertility regulation; pp. 249–258. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Progesterone receptor blockage. Effect on uterine contractility and early pregnancy. Bygdeman M, Swahn ML. Contraception. 1985;32:45–51. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(85)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Simultaneous administration compared with a 24-hour mifepristone-misoprostol interval in second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Abbas DF, Blum J, Ngoc NT, Nga NT, Chi HT, Martin R, Winikoff B. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:1077–1083. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Medical abortion in the late first trimester: a systematic review. Kapp N, Eckersberger E, Lavelanet A, Rodriguez MI. Contraception. 2019;99:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Continuing pregnancy after mifepristone and "reversal" of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review. Grossman D, White K, Harris L, Reeves M, Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B, Grimes DA. Contraception. 2015;92:206–211. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Current and potential methods for second trimester abortion. Lerma K, Blumenthal PD. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;63:24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mifepristone followed by misoprostol or oxytocin for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Elami-Suzin M, Freeman MD, Porat N, Rojansky N, Laufer N, Ben-Meir A. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:815–820. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a2dcb7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mifepristone and misoprostol versus Dilapan and sulprostone for second trimester termination of pregnancy. Jansen NE, Pasker-De Jong PC, Zondervan HA. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:847–851. doi: 10.1080/14767050802283027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Chu JJ, Devall AJ, Beeson LE, et al. Lancet. 2020;396:770–778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31788-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cost-effectiveness of mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage: an economic evaluation based on the MifeMiso trial. Okeke Ogwulu CB, Williams EV, Chu JJ, et al. BJOG. 2021;128:1534–1545. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mifepristone and misoprostol versus placebo and misoprostol for resolution of miscarriage in women diagnosed with missed miscarriage: the MifeMiso RCT. Devall A, Chu J, Beeson L, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2021;25:1–114. doi: 10.3310/hta25680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Induction of labor with mifepristone (RU 486) in intrauterine fetal death. Cabrol D, Dubois C, Cronje H, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:540–542. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91193-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pretreatment with mifepristone compared with misoprostol alone for delivery after fetal death between 14 and 28 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Allanson ER, Copson S, Spilsbury K, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:801–809. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for induction of labor in intrauterine fetal death: a randomized trial. Chaudhuri P, Datta S. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41:1884–1890. doi: 10.1111/jog.12815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.A randomized clinical trial of mifepristone (RU486) for induction of delayed menses: efficacy and acceptability. Grimes DA, Mishell DR Jr, David HP. Contraception. 1992;46:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90126-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.The possibility of using mifepristone for menstrual induction. Bygdeman M. Contraception. 2003;68:495–498. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(03)00148-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Menstrual induction with mifepristone and misoprostol. Xiao B, von Hertzen H, Zhao H, Piaggio G. Contraception. 2003;68:489–494. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Emergency contraception with mifepristone and levonorgestrel: mechanism of action. Marions L, Hultenby K, Lindell I, Sun X, Ståbi B, Gemzell Danielsson K. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:65–71. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Contraceptive use of antiprogestin. Bygdeman M, Danielsson KG, Marions L, Swahn ML. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1999;4:103–107. doi: 10.3109/13625189909064011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.The effect of RU486 administered during the proliferative and secretory phase of the cycle on the bleeding pattern, hormonal parameters and the endometrium. Swahn ML, Johannisson E, Daniore V, de la Torre B, Bygdeman M. Hum Reprod. 1988;3:915–921. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Disruption of follicular maturation and delay of ovulation after administration of the antiprogesterone RU486. Liu JH, Garzo G, Morris S, Stuenkel C, Ulmann A, Yen SS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;65:1135–1140. doi: 10.1210/jcem-65-6-1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Interventions for emergency contraception. Shen J, Che Y, Showell E, Chen K, Cheng L. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mifepristone: a novel estrogen-free daily contraceptive pill. Baird DT, Brown A, Cheng L, Critchley HO, Lin S, Narvekar N, Williams AR. Steroids. 2003;68:1099–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2003.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Effect of mifepristone on inhibition of ovulation and induction of luteolysis. Spitz IM, Croxatto HB, Lähteenmäki P, Heikinheimo O, Bardin CW. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:69–76. doi: 10.1093/humrep/9.suppl_1.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Evidence for a critical role of progesterone in the regulation of the midcycle gonadotropin surge and ovulation. Batista MC, Cartledge TP, Zellmer AW, Nieman LK, Merriam GR, Loriaux DL. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74:565–570. doi: 10.1210/jcem.74.3.1740491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Inhibition of ovulation by low-dose mifepristone (RU 486) Ledger WL, Sweeting VM, Hillier H, Baird DT. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:945–950. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Interference with ovulation by sequential treatment with the antiprogesterone RU486 and synthetic progestin. Kekkonen R, Alfthan H, Haukkamaa M, Heikinheimo O, Luukkainen T, Lähteenmäki P. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:747–750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Evaluation of mifepristone as a once a month contraceptive pill. Agarwal M, Das V, Agarwal A, Pandey A, Srivastava D. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:0–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Weekly contraception with mifepristone. Pei K, Xiao B, Jing X, Lu S, Wei L, Zhao H. Contraception. 2007;75:40–44. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.[The role of the progesterone antagonist, RU 486 (mifepristone), in preoperative cervical dilatation during the luteal phase. A randomized double-blind study] Fernandez H, Durlot F, Dubois C, Ulmann A, Frydman R. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12283016/ Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris) 1990;18:41–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mifepristone does not induce cervical softening in non-pregnant women. Ben-Chetrit A, Eldar-Geva T, Lindenberg T, et al. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2372–2376. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Effect of mifepristone on dilatation of the pregnant and non-pregnant cervix. Gupta JK, Johnson N. Lancet. 1990;335:1238–1240. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91303-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mifepristone for induction of labour. Frydman R, Baton C, Lelaidier C, Vial M, Bourget P, Fernandez H. Lancet. 1991;337:488–489. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93421-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Outcomes of mifepristone usage for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy. Randomized controlled trial. Baev OR, Rumyantseva VP, Tysyachnyu OV, Kozlova OA, Sukhikh GT. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;217:144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mifepristone for induction of labour. Hapangama D, Neilson JP. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002865.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.[Combined use of methotrexate and mifepristone for ectopic pregnancy management: a meta-analysis] Song HD, Chen SL, He JX, Qiu YW. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17259128/ Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2006;26:1815–1817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Treating ectopic pregnancy with the combination of mifepristone and methotrexate: a phase II nonrandomized study. Perdu M, Camus E, Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Chastang C, Philippe HJ, Nisand I. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:640–643. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70057-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancies: a randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate-mifepristone and methotrexate-placebo. Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Camus E, et al. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1802–1808. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Preliminary report on the treatment of endometriosis with low-dose mifepristone (RU 486) Kettel LM, Murphy AA, Morales AJ, Yen SS. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1151–1156. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70316-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Treatment of endometriosis with the antiprogesterone mifepristone (RU486) Kettel LM, Murphy AA, Morales AJ, Ulmann A, Baulieu EE, Yen SS. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:23–28. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Effect of mifepristone in the different treatments of endometriosis. Zhang YX. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27328489/ Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;43:350–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Progesterone is essential for maintenance and growth of uterine leiomyoma. Ishikawa H, Ishi K, Serna VA, Kakazu R, Bulun SE, Kurita T. Endocrinology. 2010;151:2433–2442. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Progesterone receptor regulates Bcl-2 gene expression through direct binding to its promoter region in uterine leiomyoma cells. Yin P, Lin Z, Cheng YH, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4459–4466. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.[A clinical control study on the treatment of uterine leiomyoma with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist or mifepristone] Zeng C, Gu M, Huang H. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10806751/ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1998;33:490–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mifepristone-induced amenorrhoea is associated with an increase in microvessel density and glucocorticoid receptor and a decrease in stromal vascular endothelial growth factor. Narvekar N, Critchley HO, Cheng L, Baird DT. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2312–2318. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mifepristone: where do we come from and where are we going? Clinical development over a quarter of a century. Spitz IM. Contraception. 2010;82:442–452. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mifepristone for uterine fibroids. Tristan M, Orozco LJ, Steed A, Ramírez-Morera A, Stone P. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007687.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Low dose mifepristone in medical management of uterine leiomyoma - an experience from a tertiary care hospital from north India. Kulshrestha V, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, Sareen N, Garg P, Hari S, Thulkar J. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734720/ Indian J Med Res. 2013;137:1154–1162. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Regression of uterine leiomyomata in response to the antiprogesterone RU 486. Murphy AA, Kettel LM, Morales AJ, Roberts VJ, Yen SS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76:513–517. doi: 10.1210/jcem.76.2.8432797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Systematic review of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. Steinauer J, Pritts EA, Jackson R, Jacoby AF. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1331–1336. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127622.63269.8b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.A new trick for an old dog: the application of mifepristone in the treatment of adenomyosis. Che X, Wang J, He J, et al. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:1724–1737. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.The influence of mifepristone to caspase 3 expression in adenomyosis. Wang Y, Jiang X, Wang S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24779241/ Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41:154–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.The new application of mifepristone in the relief of adenomyosis-caused dysmenorrhea. Che X, Wang J, He J, Guo X, Li T, Zhang X. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17:224–233. doi: 10.7150/ijms.39252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mifepristone for the prevention of breakthrough bleeding in new starters of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Jain JK, Nicosia AF, Nucatola DL, Lu JJ, Kuo J, Felix JC. Steroids. 2003;68:1115–1119. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(03)00132-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Effects of mifepristone on proliferation and apoptosis of human endometrium in new users of medroxyprogesterone acetate. Jain JK, Li A, Yang W, Minoo P, Felix JC. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:798–809. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Efficacy of mifepristone in reducing intermenstrual vaginal bleeding in users of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Lal S, Kriplani A, Kulshrestha V, Sharma M, Agarwal N. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109:128–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mifepristone treatment prior to insertion of a levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system for improved bleeding control - a randomized controlled trial. Papaikonomou K, Kopp Kallner H, Söderdahl F, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:2002–2009. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Effects of a preovulatory single low dose of mifepristone on ovarian function. van der Stege JG, Pahl-van Beest EH, Beerthuizen RJ, van Lunsen RH, Scholten PC, Bogchelman DH. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11:104–108. doi: 10.1080/13625180500539505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Potential enhancement of endometrial receptivity in cycles using controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with antiprogestins: a hypothesis. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:321–325. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81918-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mifepristone is an effective oral alternative for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges and/or premature luteinization in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Escudero EL, Boerrigter PJ, Bennink HJ, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2081–2088. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mifepristone for management of Cushing's syndrome. Morgan FH, Laufgraben MJ. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:319–329. doi: 10.1002/phar.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with Cushing's syndrome. Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Findling JW, Molitch ME, Schteingart DE, Gross C. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2039–2049. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Global clinical response in Cushing's syndrome patients treated with mifepristone. Katznelson L, Loriaux DL, Feldman D, Braunstein GD, Schteingart DE, Gross C. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014;80:562–569. doi: 10.1111/cen.12332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Clinical management of patients with Cushing syndrome treated with mifepristone: consensus recommendations. Brown DR, East HE, Eilerman BS, et al. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;6:18. doi: 10.1186/s40842-020-00105-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mifepristone improves adipose tissue insulin sensitivity in insulin resistant individuals. Gubbi S, Muniyappa R, Sharma ST, Grewal S, McGlotten R, Nieman LK. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:1501–1515. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.A randomized phase I trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without mifepristone for advanced breast cancer. Nanda R, Stringer-Reasor EM, Saha P, et al. Springerplus. 2016;5:947. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2457-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mifepristone derivative FZU-00,003 suppresses triple-negative breast cancer cell growth partially via miR-153-KLF5 axis. Liu R, Chen H, Zhao P, et al. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16:611–619. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.39491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Targeting progesterone signaling prevents metastatic ovarian cancer. Kim O, Park EY, Kwon SY, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:31993–32004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013595117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mifepristone inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Goyeneche AA, Carón RW, Telleria CM. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3370–3379. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Phase I/II trial of enzalutamide and mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Serritella AV, Shevrin D, Heath EI, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:1549–1559. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Long-term administration of mifepristone (RU486): clinical tolerance during extended treatment of meningioma. Grunberg SM, Weiss MH, Russell CA, Spitz IM, Ahmadi J, Sadun A, Sitruk-Ware R. Cancer Invest. 2006;24:727–733. doi: 10.1080/07357900601062339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Management of patients receiving long-term treatment with mifepristone. Spitz IM, Grunberg SM, Chabbert-Buffet N, Lindenberg T, Gelber H, Sitruk-Ware R. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1719–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mifepristone repurposing in treatment of high-grade gliomas. Llaguno-Munive M, Vazquez-Lopez MI, Jurado R, Garcia-Lopez P. Front Oncol. 2021;11:606907. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.606907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Double-blind phase III randomized trial of the antiprogestin agent mifepristone in the treatment of unresectable meningioma: SWOG S9005. Ji Y, Rankin C, Grunberg S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4093–4098. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Effect of the antiprogesterone RU-38486 on meningioma implanted into nude mice. Olson JJ, Beck DW, Schlechte JA, Loh PM. J Neurosurg. 1987;66:584–587. doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.66.4.0584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Mifepristone overcomes tumor resistance to temozolomide associated with DNA damage repair and apoptosis in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma. Llaguno-Munive M, Romero-Piña M, Serrano-Bello J, et al. Cancers (Basel) 2018;11:16. doi: 10.3390/cancers11010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Anticancer effects of mifepristone on human uveal melanoma cells. Alvarez PB, Laskaris A, Goyeneche AA, Chen Y, Telleria CM, Burnier JV. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:607. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02306-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.[New developments in glaucoma medical treatment] Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Pérez-López M, Won Kim HR, Rebolleda G. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2009;84:491–500. doi: 10.4321/s0365-66912009001000003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Interaction between progesterone and mifepristone on intraocular pressure in rabbits. Green K, Cheeks L, Slagle T, Phillips CI. Curr Eye Res. 1989;8:317–320. doi: 10.3109/02713688908997574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Effects of mifepristone on rabbit intraocular pressure in the presence and absence of dexamethasone. Green K, Cheeks L, Slagle T, Phillips CI. Ophthalmic Res. 1990;22:247–252. doi: 10.1159/000267030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Clinical and biological effects of mifepristone treatment for psychotic depression. Flores BH, Kenna H, Keller J, Solvason HB, Schatzberg AF. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:628–636. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Alcohol dependence and withdrawal increase sensitivity of central amygdalar GABAergic synapses to the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone in male rats. Khom S, Rodriguez L, Gandhi P, et al. Neurobiol Dis. 2022;164:105610. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.The efficacy of mifepristone in the reduction and prevention of olanzapine-induced weight gain in rats. Beebe KL, Block T, Debattista C, Blasey C, Belanoff JK. Behav Brain Res. 2006;171:225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sustained weight loss in patients treated with mifepristone for Cushing's syndrome: a follow-up analysis of the SEISMIC study and long-term extension. Fein HG, Vaughan TB 3rd, Kushner H, Cram D, Nguyen D. BMC Endocr Disord. 2015;15:63. doi: 10.1186/s12902-015-0059-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mifepristone as a therapeutic agent in psychiatry. Howland RH. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2013;51:11–14. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20130513-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Slowing the progression of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease using mifepristone. Belanoff JK, Jurik J, Schatzberg LD, DeBattista C, Schatzberg AF. J Mol Neurosci. 2002;19:201–206. doi: 10.1007/s12031-002-0033-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]