Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 22;33(8):1725–1738. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06387-x

Table 2.

Characteristics of older women with VF according to severity and number

No VF
n = 2163
Grade 1 VF
n = 260
Grade 2 VF
n = 216
Grade 3 VF
n = 213
p-
valuea,b
1 VF
n = 481
2 VF
n = 141
 ≥ 3 VF
n = 67
p-valuea,b
Age (years) 77.7 ± 1.6 78.0 ± 1.5§ 78.0 ± 1.6 78.1 ± 1.6#  < 0.01 78.0 ± 1.6 78.0 ± 1.5 78.2 ± 1.7  < 0.01
Height (cm) 162.2 ± 5.9 161.9 ± 5.6 161.8 ± 5.8 159.9 ± 6.0# Ω€  < 0.01 161.6 ± 5.8 161.2 ± 5.6 159.2 ± 6.3∑ β  < 0.01
Weight (kg) 68.5 ± 11.9 69.3 ± 11.4 69.4 ± 12.4 67.4 ± 12.6 0.28 68.8 ± 11.6 70.7 ± 12.7 64.3 ± 13.4∑ β µ  < 0.01
Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.1 ± 4.3 26.4 ± 4.0 26.5 ± 4.5 26.3 ± 4.5 0.29 26.3 ± 4.2 27.2 ± 4.4£ 25.2 ± 4.6 β 0.01
Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2) 0.67 ± 0.11 0.65 ± 0.10§ 0.64 ± 0.09¤ 0.62 ± 0.11# Ω  < 0.01 0.64 ± 0.09 0.64 ± 0.09£ 0.60 ± 0.12∑ β µ  < 0.01
Femoral neck BMD (T-score)  − 1.57 ± 0.90  − 1.73 ± 0.81§  − 1.83 ± 0.73¤  − 1.95 ± 0.89# Ω  < 0.01  − 1.79 ± 0.79  − 1.80 ± 0.79£  − 2.19 ± 0.97∑ β µ  < 0.01
FRAX MOF without BMD (%) 30.3 ± 11.9 30.9 ± 10.8 32.2 ± 12.0 35.9 ± 13.6# Ω€  < 0.01 32.1 ± 11.9 33.3 ± 12.1£ 37.4 ± 14.0∑ β  < 0.01
FRAX hip fracture without BMD (%) 17.7 ± 12.2 17.7 ± 10.5 18.9 ± 12.3 21.9 ± 14.9# Ω  < 0.01 18.7 ± 12.1 19.5 ± 12.5 23.5 ± 16.0∑ β  < 0.01
FRAX MOF with BMD (%) 22.0 ± 11.3 23.9 ± 11.4§ 25.2 ± 11.5¤ 29.6 ± 14.8# Ω€  < 0.01 25.1 ± 12.4 26.4 ± 11.9£ 32.3 ± 15.5∑ β µ  < 0.01
FRAX hip fracture with BMD (%) 10.3 ± 10.5 11.4 ± 10.8 12.4 ± 11.1¤ 16.1 ± 11.1# Ω€  < 0.01 12.4 ± 12.0 13.1 ± 11.8£ 18.8 ± 16.3∑ β µ  < 0.01
Fall within the last year, % (n) 28.9 (626) 25.0 (65) 27.8 (60) 38.0 (81) 0.02 26.6 (128) 39.0 (55) 34.3 (23) 0.03
Self-reported prior fracture, % (n)c 33.1 (717) 38.1 (99) 45.8 (99) 62.0 (132)  < 0.01 44.1 (212) 53.2 (75) 64.2 (43)  < 0.01
Family history of hip fracture, % (n) 17.2 (373) 17.7 (46) 18.5 (40) 20.7 (44) 0.64 18.3 (88) 21.3 (30) 17.9 (12) 0.65
Current smoking, % (n) 5.0 (109) 3.1 (8) 5.6 (12) 7.0 (15) 0.26 4.0 (19) 5.0 (7) 13.4 (9) 0.01
Excessive alcohol consumption, % (n)d 0.5 (10) 0.8 (2) 0.0 (0) 0.9 (2) 0.33 k 0.6 (3) 0.7 (1) 0.0 (0) 0.69 k
Secondary osteoporosis, % (n)e 22.7 (492) 24.2 (63) 16.2 (35) 18.3 (39) 0.06 18.9 (91) 21.3 (30) 23.9 (16) 0.31
Medications
Glucocorticoid use, % (n)f 3.0 (64) 3.1 (8) 4.2 (9) 7.5 (16) 0.01 3.7 (18) 6.4 (9) 9.0 (6) 0.01 k
Osteoporosis medication, % (n)g 8.2 (178) 10.4 (27) 13.4 (29) 31.9 (68)  < 0.01 14.8 (71) 21.3 (30) 34.3 (23)  < 0.01
Medical history
Rheumatoid arthritis, % (n) 3.7 (79) 4.6 (12) 2.8 (6) 5.2 (11) 0.51 4.4 (21) 2.8 (4) 6.0 (4) 0.62
Hyperthyroidism, % (n) 5.1 (110) 4.6 (12) 4.6 (10) 4.7 (10) 0.98 4.8 (23) 3.5 (5) 6.0 (4) 0.84
Osteoporosis, % (n)h 16.5 (356) 24.2 (63) 27.3 (59) 47.4 (101)  < 0.01 27.2 (131) 38.3 (54) 56.7 (38)  < 0.01
Hypertension, % (n) 52.3 (1131) 51.2 (133) 53.2 (115) 51.2 (109) 0.96 51.8 (249) 51.1 (72) 53.7 (36) 0.98
Stroke, % (n) 6.4 (139) 8.5 (22) 4.6 (10) 10.3 (22) 0.06 7.3 (35) 6.4 (9) 14.9 (10) 0.05
Myocardial infarction, % (n) 4.4 (95) 4.2 (11) 5.1 (11) 8.0 (17) 0.12 4.8 (23) 7.1 (10) 9.0 (6) 0.17
Angina, % (n) 5.0 (107) 4.6 (12) 7.9 (17) 7.0 (15) 0.18 5.8 (28) 7.1 (10) 9.0 (6) 0.33
Heart failure, % (n) 7.7 (166) 9.2 (24) 10.2 (22) 12.2 (26) 0.09 8.3 (40) 17.0 (24) 11.9 (8)  < 0.01
Diabetes, % (n) 9.6 (207) 11.9 (31) 6.9 (15) 11.3 (24) 0.26 9.1 (44) 10.6 (15) 16.4 (11) 0.28

Chronic bronchitis, asthma, emphysema,

% (n)

9.2 (200) 10.0 (26) 11.6 (25) 11.7 (25) 0.49 10.6 (51) 11.3 (16) 13.4 (9) 0.48
Cancer, % (n) 20.2 (437) 22.3 (58) 20.8 (45) 19.2 (41) 0.84 21.8 (105) 17.0 (24) 22.4 (15) 0.61
Glaucoma, % (n) 8.6 (187) 7.7 (20) 7.9 (17) 4.7 (10) 0.24 7.1 (34) 6.4 (9) 6.0 (4) 0.49

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and as percentage and number for categorical variables

Significance was defined by a p-value < 0.05 and significant values are presented in bold

VFA vertebral fracture assessment, VF vertebral fracture, BMD bone mineral density

§Grade 1 VF vs. no VF

¤Grade 2 VF vs. no VF

#Grade 3 VF vs. no VF

Grade 3 VF vs. grade 1 VF

Grade 3 VF vs. grade 2 VF

One VF vs. no VF

£Two VF vs. no VF

Two VF vs. one VF

Three or more VF vs. no VF

βThree or more VF vs. one VF

µThree or more VF vs. two VF

aContinuous variables one way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test

bCategorical variables χ2 test

cAfter 50 years of age, fractures of the skull and face are excluded

d21 or more units per week

eDiabetes (type 1 and type 2), menopause before 45 years of age, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic kidney disease

fDaily oral treatment with at least 5 mg for 3 months or more ever during lifetime

gCurrent treatment with bisphosphonates, teriparatide, or denosumab

hSelf-reported

i192

j46

kFisher’s exact test. FRAX-scores were calculated without information from VFA