Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 9;9:923657. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.923657

Table 3.

Prevalence of Brucellosis stratified according to (a) Continent-wise (b) Diagnostic test-wise (c) Species-wise for sub group analysis.

(a) Continent-wise stratification
Names of continent Prevalence % (95% CI) I2 (%) τ2 Model
Africa 8.0 (7.0–9.0) 96 0.0104 REM
Asia 8.0 (7.0–9.0) 96 0.0149 REM
(b) Diagnostic test-wise stratification
Names of the test Prevalence % (95% CI) I2 (%) τ2 Model
ELISA 7.0(6.0–8.0) 97 0.0122 REM
PCR 11.0(2.0–26.0) 79 0.0317 REM
RBPT 8.0(7.0–9.0) 93 0.0085 REM
MRT 7.0(4.0–11.0) 94 0.0107 REM
Agglutination Tests 7.0(6.0–8.0) 94 0.0115 REM
CFT 10.0(8.0–11.0) 75 0.0009 REM
LFA & FPA 4.0(3.0–6.0) 50 0.0019 FEM
Riv. Test 4.0(3.0–5.0) 56 0.0005 FEM
(c) Species-wise stratification
Names of Species' Prevalence % (95% CI) I2 (%) τ2 Model
Buffalo 6.0 (5.0–8.0) 90 0.0085 REM
Cattle 8.0(7.0–9.0) 97 0.0124 REM
Goat 6.0(5.0–7.0) 82 0.0054 REM
Sheep 7.0(6.0–8.0) 90 0.0038 REM

REM, random effects model; FEM, fixed effect model.