Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;14(9):1914. doi: 10.3390/v14091914

Table 1.

The prevalence of BtCoVs in different bat species included in the study. O—oral swabs; F—feces.

Species No of Samples No of Positives rtRT-qPCR No of Positives nRT-PCR Total No of Positives Positives % (95% CI)
Eptesicus serotinus 57 0 0 0 0% (0.0–6.3)
Nyctalus noctula 79 0 0 0 0% (0.0–4.6)
Nyctalus leisleri 3 0 0 0 0% (0.0–56.1)
Barbastella barbastellus 55 0 0 0 0% (0.0–6.5)
Plecotus auritus 30 0 0 0 0% (0.0–11.4)
Vespertillo murinus 12 0 0 0 0% (0.0–24.2)
Pipistrellus pygmaeus 29 0 0 0 0% (0–11.7)
Pipistrellus pipistrellus 10 0 0 0 0% (0–27.8)
Pipistrellus spp. 6 0 0 0 0% (0.0–39.0)
Pipistrellus nathusii 19 0 0 0 0% (0.0–16.8)
Myotis dasycneme 3 0 0 0 0% (0.0–56.1)
Myotis daubentonii 55 0 2 (F) 2 (F) 3.6% (0.6–12.3)
Myotis myotis 4 0 0 0 0% (0–49.0)
Myotis mystacinus 6 0 0 0 0% (0–39.0)
Myotis nattereri 22 0 0 0 0% (0–14.9)
Myotis bechsteinii 8 0 0 0 0% (0–32.4)
Myotis alcathoe 1 0 0 0 0% (0–94.9)
Myotis brandtii 7 0 0 0 0% (0–35.4)
Myotis emarginatus 1 0 0 0 0% (0–94.9)
Rhinolophus hipposideros 58 18 (14 O; 4 F) 3 (F) 18 (14 O; 4 F) 31% (20.6–43.8)
unidentified 38 0 0 0 0% (0.0–9.2)
Total 503 20 (14 O; 6 F) 4.0% (2.6–6.1)