Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 9;10:987276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.987276

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses on clinical pregnancy rate (random-effects model, n = 14).

Subgroups Risk ratio [95% CI] Coefficient Heterogeneity
P-value I2 (%) P-value
(1) Type of control
Sham acupuncture (n = 2) 1.24 [0.49, 3.18] 0.65 81 0.02
No adjuvant treatment (n = 12) 1.67 [1.41, 1.97] <0.00001 0 0.97
(2) Acupuncture sessions
Before FFT (n = 6) 1.75 [1.37, 2.23] <0.00001 0 0.78
Around FET (n = 7) 1.64 [1.32, 2.05] <0.0001 0 0.94
After FET (n = 1) 0.82 [0.60, 1.13] 0.22
(3) Total times of acupuncture
Less than 5 times (n = 3) 1.15 [0.70, 1.90] 0.57 66 0.05
5-15 times (n = 5) 1.59 [1.24, 2.04] 0.0003 0 0.81
More than 15 times (n = 6) 1.86 [1.44, 2.40] <0.00001 0 0.96
(4) Populations
Recurrent implantation failure (n = 6) 1.57 [1.57, 1.21] 0.0006 0 0.8
Anovulation (n = 1) 1.67 [1.00, 2.76] 0.05
Polycystic ovary syndrome (n = 1) 1.77 [1.09, 2.88] 0.02
Elderly women (> 35 years old) (n = 1) 2.19 [1.11, 4.33] 0.02
Unclear (n = 5) 1.46 [0.96, 2.22] 0.08 68 0.1