Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 19;29:101952. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101952

Table 3.

Treatment engagement and satisfaction of the assigned website.

Variable N Mean (SD) or No. (%)
Incident Rate Ratio or Odds Ratio (95% CI) p valuea
Overall (N = 222) Smokefree (n = 121) WebQuit (n = 101)
Engagement variable
No. of times logged inb 222 4.8 (7.0)c 4.1 (4.2)c 5.6 (9.2)c Incident Rate Ratio: 1.26 (0.98, 1.62) 0.074
No. of unique days of usec 222 3.9 (4.9)d 3.5 (3.4)c 4.5 (6.2)d Incident Rate Ratio: 1.26 (1.00, 1.60) 0.052
Minutes spent on the website per session 222 4.7 (5.2)e 3.1 (2.5)f 6.8 (6.1)g Incident Rate Ratio: 2.18 (1.71, 2.77) <0.001
Total minutes spent on the websiteb 222 20.0 (29.7)h 11.9 (16.1)i 29.7 (38.2)j Incident Rate Ratio: 2.32 (1.68, 3.20) <0.001
Length of use of website in days (total) 222 54.7 (84.7)k 56.5 (87.4)l 52.6 (81.7)m Incident Rate Ratio: 0.93 (0.62, 1.38) 0.713



Satisfaction at 3-months, No. (%)
Satisfied with assigned website 170 137/170 (81%) 81/99 (82%) 56/71 (79%) Odds Ratio: 0.89 (0.41, 1.94) 0.777
Website was useful for quitting 175 126/175 (72%) 76/99 (77%) 50/76 (66%) Odds Ratio: 0.60 (0.30, 1.17) 0.131
Would recommend assigned website 153 140/153 (92%) 79/86 (92%) 61/67 (91%) Odds Ratio: 0.97 (0.30, 3.11) 0.952

aTwo-sided p values were calculated from regression models adjusted for factors used in stratified randomization: gender, education, and heavy smoking.

bModel further adjusted for age and heavy drinking.

cModel further adjusted for age.

Median values, c 3; d 2; e 3.3; f 2.2; g 5.5; h 10.4; i 6.3; j 16.3; k 17.5; l 20; m 15.