Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;2(5):409–417. doi: 10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00054

Table 3. Estimates of Plastic Burning Contributions to PM2.5 Mass at Four Sites in the USA and in Dhaka, Bangladesha.

      lower estimate
median estimate
site dates of Study n PM2.5 mass (μg m–3) PM2.5 mass (%) PM2.5 mass (μg m–3) PM2.5 mass (%)
Atlanta, Georgia 24–27 Aug, 2015 4 0.005–0.05 0.04–0.4 0.04–0.3 0.3–3
Atlanta, Georgia 19–22 Jan, 2016 4 0.02–0.08 0.3–0.8 0.2–0.6 2–7
Houston, Texas 18–20 May, 2015 3 0.01–0.04 0.1–0.2 0.09–0.3 ∼1
Iowa City, Iowa 14–17 Nov, 2015 4 0.003–0.05 NA 0.03–0.4 NA
Iowa City, Iowa 16 Oct–12 Nov, 2020 10 0.03–0.09 NA 0.3–0.7 NA
Centreville, Alabama 12–14 July, 2013 4 0.004–0.02 0.03–0.3 0.03–0.2 0.3–2
Dhaka, Bangladesh Feb–April, 2013 3 0.3–4 0.6–2 2–35 5–15
a

Lower and median values were calculated using TPB-to-PM emission ratios for polystyrene (Hoffer et al.10) and the median of select literature values (Table S2), respectively. Contributions to PM2.5 OC are reported in Table S3.