Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 8;27(18):5820. doi: 10.3390/molecules27185820

Table 4.

Inhibitory effect of the EOs on root growth (cm) of Lolium rigidum, Sinapis arvensis and Trifolium campestre.

Weeds Doses (µL/mL) Essential Oils
E. occidentalis E. stricklandii E. striaticalyx
L. rigidum Control (water) 5.5 ± 0.3 a 5.5 ± 0.3 a 5.5 ± 0.3 a
0 5.7 ± 0.3 a 5.7 ± 0.3 a 5.7 ± 0.3 a
0.75 5.3 ± 0.3 a 4.9 ± 0.2 a 3.7 ± 0.2 b
1.50 3.2 ± 0.2 b 3.5 ± 0.3 b 2.2 ± 0.1 c
2.25 1.3 ± 0.1 c 2.3 ± 0.3 c 2.2 ± 0.1 c
3.00 0.5 ± 0.2 d 1.4 ± 0.1 d 0.3 ± 0.1 d
S. arvensis Control (water) 6.9 ± 0.4 a 6.9 ± 0.4 a 6.9 ± 0.4 a
0 6.8 ± 0.32 a 6.8 ± 0.32 a 6.8 ± 0.32 a
0.75 6.5 ± 0.3 a 4.1 ± 0.1 b 5.0 ± 0.2 b
1.50 4.7 ± 0.4 b 2.3 ± 0.2 c 2.4 ± 0.2 c
2.25 2.9 ± 0.2 c 1.5 ± 0.2 d 2 ± 0.1 c
3.00 0.1 ± 0.1 d 0 ± 0 e 0 ± 0 d
T. campestre Control (water) 6 ± 0.2 a 6 ± 0.2 a 6 ± 0.2 a
0 5.6 ± 0.3 a 5.6 ± 0.3 a 5.6 ± 0.3 a
0.75 5.1 ± 0.2 a 4.9 ± 0.1 b 3.7 ± 0.5 b
1.50 3.2 ± 0.2 b 2.7 ± 0.3 c 1.8 ± 0.2 c
2.25 2.3 ± 0.4 c 2.5 ± 0.2 c 1.3 ± 0.1 c
3.00 1.4 ± 0.1 d 0 ± 0 d 0 ± 0 d

Results are reported as the mean ± SD of three experiments. The superscripts are used to compare the dose effect for each oil and on each weed. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (p ≤ 0.05). Data are expressed in cm.