Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;11(18):2404. doi: 10.3390/plants11182404

Table 1.

Effect of drought, heat, and combined drought and heat on height (%), fresh weight (FW) (%), and dry weight (DW) (%) of four eggplant cultivars. Results are expressed as percentage of control.

Variety Treatments Height (%) FW (%) DW (%)
‘Adriatica’ C 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a
D 56.4 ± 6.8 c 56.3 ± 4.5 b 72.4 ± 9.2 b
H 82.8 ± 5.2 b 68.3 ± 7.3 b 86.6 ± 6.5 b
H + D 46.9 ± 7.3 d 11.7 ± 4.3 c 30.5 ± 5.4 c
‘Black Beauty’ C 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a
D 59.4 ± 8.2 c 58 ± 5.5 b 79.1 ± 6.7 b
H 83.4 ± 5.2 b 70.8 ± 4.7 b 92.8 ± 8.1 b
H + D 47.2 ± 6.3 d 13.7 ± 4.2 c 26.4 ± 4.8 c
‘Bonica’ C 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a
D 78.2 ± 5.3 b 73.4 ± 9.1 c 74 ± 5.8 c
H 95 ± 7.2 b 91.8 ± 5.2 b 89.7 ± 4.2 b
H + D 58.9 ± 3.9 c 52.4 ± 6.3 d 53.7 ± 4.7 d
‘Galine’ C 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a
D 78.1 ± 7.1 b 73.4 ± 6.1 c 73.9 ± 3.9 c
H 94.7 ± 6.4 b 91.8 ± 4.1 b 89.7 ± 4.7 b
H + D 58.8 ± 5.3 c 52.4 ± 5.2 d 53.7 ± 6.5 d

The values are means (±standard errors) of four repetitions. Different lowercase letters within each treatment (n = 4) represent significant differences among cultivars, based on Student’s t-test at 5 % level. (C, control; H, heat stress; D, drought stress; H + D, heat + drought stresses).