Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;58(9):1290. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091290

Table 2.

The studies’ results. Abbreviations: BMI (kg/m2); VTE: Venous thromboembolic disease; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism; m, mean; md, median, y, years; mo, months; n, absolute number; NA: Not available or not applicable., Data are presented as mean ± SE, Data are presented as mean (range).

Reference Title Type of Study Sample Size 
(n)
Obese Subjects (n(%)) OR/HR/RR (95%, CI) for Recurrence for Obese Subjects Association of Obesity with VTE Recurrence
García-Fuster et al. [14] Long-Term Prospective Study of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Younger than 50 Years Prospective cohort 98 18 (18.36%) RR = 1.92 (0.83–4.43) Not significant
Linnemann et al. [15] Impact of sex and traditional cardiovascular risk factors on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: results from the German MAISTHRO Registry Cross-sectional 1006 226 (22.7%) RR = 1.1 (0.83–1.35), p = 0.664 Not significant
Rodger et al. [16] Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy Prospective cohort 646 28 (8.9%) RR = 2.33 (1.14–4.74), p = 0.02 Significant association (females only)
Eichinger et al. [17] Overweight, obesity, and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism Prospective cohort 1107 271 (24%) HR = 1.6(1.0–2.4), p = 0.02 Significant association
Di Nisio et al. [18] Obesity, poor muscle strength, and venous thromboembolism in older persons: the InCHIANTI study Prospective cohort 1045 265 (25.3%) OR = 9.69 (3.13–30.01) for obesity, OR = 14.57 (5.16–41.15) for obesity with reduced mauscle strength Significant association
Farzamnia et al. [19] The Predictive Factors of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis Retrospective cohort 385 7 (1.81%) OR = 0.013, p = 0.908 Not significant
Olié et al. [20] Sex specific risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism. Prospective cohort 583 114 (19.55%) HR = 2.8 (1.3–6) (Female population) Significant association (females only)
Rodger et al. [21] Long-term risk of venous thrombosis after stopping anticoagulants for a first unprovoked event: A multi-national cohort Prospective cohort 663 248 (37.5%) OR = 2.3 (1.1–5.1) (female populaton) Significant association (females only)
Franco Moreno et al. [22] A risk score for prediction of recurrence in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (DAMOVES) Prospective cohort 398 111 (27.8%) HR = 3.92 (1.75–8.75), p = 0.0001 Significant association
Huang et al. [23] Occurrence and predictors of recurrence after a first episode of acute venous thromboembolism: population-based Worcester Venous Thromboembolism Study Retorpsective cohort 2989 826 (27.63%) HR = 0.81 (0.7–1.21) at 3 years, HR = 0.70 (0.43–1.13). At 3 months, HR = 0.46 (0.15–1.44) patients with active cancer, HR = 0.79 (0.46–1.36) patients without active cancer Not significant
Di Nisio et al. [24] Treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban in relation to body weight. A sub-analysis of the EINSTEIN DVT/PE studies Post-hoc of a RCT 8230 2491 (30.26%) HR = 0.70 (0.31–1.57) f for patients with BMI = 30–34.9: HR = 1.45 (0.62–3.39) for patients with BMI ≥ 35: Not significant
Asim et al. [25] Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis After the First Venous Thromboembolism Event: A Single-Institution Experience Retrospective cohort 662 257 (47%) OR = 2.2 (1.37–3.53), p = 0.001 Significant association
Vučković et al. [26] Recurrent venous thrombosis related to overweight and obesity: results from the MEGA follow-up study Prospective cohort 3889 814 (20.93%) HR = 1.05 (0.85–1.30) Not significant
Mueller et al. [27] Obesity is not associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism in elderly patients: Results from the prospective SWITCO65+ cohort study Prospective cohort 986 242 (24.51%) HR = 1.10 (0.7–1.74) Not significant
Stewart et al. [28] Metabolic Syndrome Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence after Acute Pulmonary Embolism Retrospective cohort 72,936 16,046 (22%) HR = 2.08 (2.00–2.17) Significant association
Stewart et al. [29] Metabolic syndrome increases risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after acute deep vein thrombosis Retrospective cohort 151,054 28,700 (19%) OR = 1.53 (1.48–1.59) Significant association
Beemen et al. [30] Prognostic characteristics and body mass index in patients with pulmonary embolism: does size matter? Post-hoc of a RCT 1911 672 (35.16%) OR = 1.82 (0.78–4.25) for BMI = 30–34.9: OR = 0.71 (0.78–3.34), for BMI =35–39.9 OR = 1.41 (0.78–2.53) for BMI ≥ 40 Not significant
Giorgi-Pierfranceschi et al. [31] Morbid Obesity and Mortality in Patients With VTE: Findings From Real-Life Clinical Practice Prospective cohort 16,490 1642 (9.95%) HR = 1.01 (0.64–1.58) for BMI ≥ 40 without cancer: HR = 1.03 (0.52–2.01) for BMI ≥ 40 with cancer Not significant
Cardinal et al. [32] Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants across body mass index groups in patients with venous thromboembolism: a retrospective cohort design Retrospective cohort 1059 552 (52.19%) OR = 0.98 (0.49–1.65) for BMI = 30–39.9 
OR = 1.52 (0.74–3.15) for BMI ≥ 40
Not significant
Weitz et al. [33] Influence of body mass index on clinical outcomes in venous thromboembolism: Insights from GARFIELD-VTE Prospective cohort 9479 3073 (32.41%) HR = 1.07(0.85–1.340), p = 0.5521 Not significant