Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;12(9):814. doi: 10.3390/metabo12090814

Table 1.

Characterization of metabolomics studies of retinal neovascularization events.

References Comparison Age Male% Source/Race Biofluid Technique Employed Evaluation Standard
ROP
Yang (2020) ROP patients (n = 40) GA (31.20 ± 4.62 weeks) 37.50 China Blood UPLC-MS/MS OPLS-DA (VIP > 1) & t-tests (p < 0.05) & Wilcoxon (p < 0.05)
controls (n = 41) GA (30.96 ± 4.17 weeks) 73.17
Nilsson (2021) 47 ROP cases Sweden Serum LC-MS Repeated measures data (Spline function)
cord blood and at postnatal days 1, 7, 14, and 28, and at postmenstrual weeks 32, 36, and 40
Zhou (2021) ROP patients (n = 58) 29.09 ± 2.23 (weeks) 58.62 China Plasma HPLC-MS/MS Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05)
controls (n = 25) 31.29 ± 2.33 (weeks) 52.00
Zhou (2020) ROP patients (n = 38) GA (29.28 ± 2.42) 55.26 China Plasma UHPLC-MS OPLS-DA (VIP >1) and t-test (p < 0.05/0.05 < p < 0.1)
controls (n = 24) 30.61 ± 2.75 56.52
Ozcan (2020) ROP patients (n = 26) GA (28.5 ± 2.7) Turkey Plasma LCMS/MS Mann-Whitney-U test (p < 0.05)
controls (n = 29) 31.52 ± 2.6
AMD
Mitchell (2018) NVAMD patients (n = 100) 79.2 35.00 America Plasma LC-MS and LC-MS/MS Nested feature selection
controls (n =192) 71.9 36.00
Luo (2017) NVAMD patients (n = 20) 66.20 ± 11.51 55.00 China Plasma UPLC-QTOF MS PLS-DA (VIP > 1) & t-test (p < 0.05 or 0.05 < p < 0.1)
controls (n = 20) 64.70 ± 11.60 55.00
Osborn (2013) NVAMD patients (n = 26) 76.0 ± 5.7 Caucasian Plasma LC-FTMS Multiple testing
controls (n = 19) 76.4 ± 4.8
Li (2016) PCV (n = 21) 60.7 ± 9.4 62.00 China Serum UPLC-MS OPLS (VIP > 1), t-test (p < 0.05)
controls (n = 19) 64.8 ± 9.2 53.00
Barca (2020) NVAMD patients (n = 40) 81.1 39.00 France Plasma LC MS t-test (p < 0.05)
controls (n =40) 81.8 41.00
Liu (2020) AMD (n =88), PCV (n = 102), PM (n = 57) 69.84 ± 8.47 (AMD), 66.06 ± 11.42 (PCV), 55.32 ± 14.49 (PM) 66.28 (AMD),
71.57 (PCV),
28.07 (PM)
China Serum GC-TOF-MS OPLS-DA (VIP > 1.0), t-test (p < 0.05), and FC > 1.2 or <0.8
controls (n = 81) 65.83 ± 11.94 35.80
Han (2020) nAMD patients (n =26) 74.12 53.85 China AH UHPLC-MS/MS OPLS-DA (VIP > 1) & one-way variance (p < 0.05)
Cataract patients without AMD (n = 20) 69.6 65.00
Deng (2021) 127 nAMD (CNV + PCV) 71.1 ± 8.4 61.00 China Plasma UHPLC-MS PLS-DA (VIP ≥ 1), FC ≥ 2 and FC ≤ 0.5, p < 0.05
controls (n = 50) 68.5 ± 9.0 61.00
Lambert (2020) nAMD (n = 72) 38.89 European Serum NMR one-way ANOVA
controls (n = 50) 74.96 (6.24) 48.00
PDR
Sumarriva (2019) PDR patients (n = 34) 55.7 ± 10.9 65.60 America Plasma LC-MS PLS-DA (VIP ≥ 2)
NPDR patients (n = 49) 59.4 ± 11.3 61.40
Haines (2018) PDR (n = 9) 41 ± 10 America Vitreous UHPLC-MS ANOVA, t-test (p < 0.05)
rhegmatogenous RD (n = 25), and controls (n = 8) 68 ± 6 (controls);
62 ± 10 (rhegmatogenous RD)
Zhu (2019) PDR (n = 21) 49 (46–56.5) 42.86 China Plasma UPLC Q-TOF-MS t-test (p < 10−5), AUC ≥ 0.95 & PLS-DA (VIP > 1)
NDR (duration ≥ 10y) (n = 21) 55 (50–58) 42.86
Wang (2019) PDR (n = 28) (Vitreous); PDR (n = 23) (AH) 49.61 (26–65) 42.86 China Vitreous & AH GC-TOF-MS OPLS-DA (VIP > 1), Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05)
non-diabetic patients with MH (n = 22) (Vitreous); non-diabetic patients with cataract (n = 25) (AH) 53.95 (32–71) 36.36
Paris (2015) PDR (n = 20) Tokyo Vitreous HILIC & RPLC QTOF-MS Welch’s t test (p < 0.01, FC > 2)
controls (n = 31)
Barba (2010) PDR (n = 22) Spain Vitreous NMR
non-diabetic patients with MH (n = 22)
ABHARY (2009) no diabetic retinopathy (n = 330) Australia Serum LC-MS Hierarchical multiple regression (p < 0.05)
PDR (n = 101)
Tomita (2020) PDR (n = 43) 58.1 ± 13.6 77.1 Tokyo Vitreous UHPLC-MS t-test (FDR < 0.05)
controls (n = 21) 69.4 ± 7.0 42.1
Lin (2020) PDR (n = 31) America Vitreous LC/MS/MS t-test (p < 0.05)
controls (n = 13)
Yun (2020) PDR (n = 51) 62.60 (11.60) 60.2 Korea Serum LC-MS Logistic regression analysis
NPDR (n = 123) 61.18 (11.87) 50.29
Ye (2021) PDR (n = 45) 59.9 ± 11.3 55.56 China Fecal UPLC-MS PLS-DA (VIP > 1), p < 0.05, |log2(FC)| > 1
diabetic patients without DR (n = 90) 60.9 ± 9.9 55.56
Wang (2022) PDR (n = 88) (Plasma); PDR (n = 51) (Vitreous) 55.3 ± 9.7 (Plasma); 54.9 ± 9.2 (Vitreous) 51.80 China Plasma & Vitreous UPLC-MS/MS FDR < 0.05, OPLS-DA (VIP > 1.0), FC > 1.2 or <0.83 and multivariate analysis
nondiabetic controls (n = 51) (Plasma); nondiabetic controls(n = 23) (Vitreous) 67.0 ± 8.1 (Plasma); 67.1 ± 8.8 (Vitreous) 36.49

ROP = retinopathy of prematurity; nAMD = Neovascular age-related macular degeneration; PCV = polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; PDR = proliferative diabetic retinopathy; NPDR = non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; RD = retinal detachment; MH = macular hole; GA = gestational age; AH = aqueous humor; LC = Liquid Chromatogram; MS = mass spectrometry; UPLC = Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography; GC = gas chromatography; TOF = time of flight; Q-TOF = Quadrupole-Time of Flight; OPLS-DA = orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis; PLS-DA = partial least squares discriminant analysis; ANOVA = one-way analysis of variance; FC = fold change; VIP = variable importance in projection; FDR = false discovery rate.