Table 3.
A comparison of the quality of the whole heart surfaces from different methods on MMWHS MR and CT test datasets.
| Epi | LA | LV | RA | RV | Ao | PA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| CT | ANE (↓) | Ours | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| 2DUNet | 0.036 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.030 | 0.010 | 0.023 | ||
| 3DUNet | 0.033 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.017 | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.016 | ||
| Voxel2Mesh | 0.136 | 0.171 | 0.129 | 0.150 | 0.136 | 0.143 | 0.105 | ||
| ANLD (↓) | Ours | 0.091 | 0.078 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.080 | 0.076 | 0.090 | |
| 2DUNet | 0.287 | 0.280 | 0.287 | 0.282 | 0.286 | 0.265 | 0.278 | ||
| 3DUNet | 0.292 | 0.284 | 0.295 | 0.295 | 0.290 | 0.273 | 0.291 | ||
| Voxel2Mesh | 0.113 | 0.119 | 0.129 | 0.134 | 0.126 | 0.140 | 0.160 | ||
| Intersection (%) (↓) | Ours | 0.014 | 0.006 | 0.017 | 0.007 | 0.024 | 0.005 | 0.049 | |
| 2DUNet | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 3DUNet | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| Voxel2Mesh | 0.269 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.020 | ||
| MR | ANE (↓) | Ours | 0.015 | 0.012 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.015 | 0.017 |
| 2DUNet | 0.057 | 0.016 | 0.022 | 0.024 | 0.033 | 0.026 | 0.018 | ||
| 3DUNet | 0.056 | 0.017 | 0.035 | 0.020 | 0.034 | 0.037 | 0.014 | ||
| Voxel2Mesh | 0.104 | 0.189 | 0.130 | 0.136 | 0.150 | 0.123 | 0.160 | ||
| ANLD (↓) | Ours | 0.103 | 0.093 | 0.088 | 0.101 | 0.092 | 0.088 | 0.103 | |
| 2DUNet | 0.287 | 0.274 | 0.285 | 0.282 | 0.276 | 0.275 | 0.289 | ||
| 3DUNet | 0.296 | 0.283 | 0.299 | 0.297 | 0.288 | 0.296 | 0.304 | ||
| Voxel2Mesh | 0.130 | 0.132 | 0.129 | 0.144 | 0.139 | 0.155 | 0.159 | ||
| Intersection (%) (↓) | Ours | 0.069 | 0.018 | 0.023 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.108 | 0.134 | |
| 2DUNet | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| 3DUNet | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| Voxel2Mesh | 0.189 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.070 | 0.000 | 0.059 | 0.020 | ||