Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2021 Sep 8;74:102222. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102222

Table 4.

A comparison of prediction accuracy on cine MR dataset from different methods. All accuracy measures are represented by mean ± standard deviation, which are computed over different patients and time frames.

Epi LA LV RA RV Ao PA WH

Dice (↑) Ours 0.656 ± 0.169 0.708 ± 0.187 0.822 ± 0.104 0.672 ± 0.114 0.643 ± 0.228 0.543 ± 0.255 0.445 ± 0.225 0.693 ± 0.112
2D UNet 0.543 ± 0.263 0.517 ± 0.283 0.734 ± 0.218 0.274 ± 0.218 0.644 ± 0.184 0.393 ± 0.215 0.487 ± 0.286 0.598 ± 0.166
3D UNet 0.546 ± 0.244 0.702 ± 0.22 0.782 ± 0.134 0.598 ± 0.169 0.631 ± 0.144 0.495 ± 0.175 0.285 ± 0.249 0.627 ± 0.131
Voxel2Mesh 0.438 ± 0.178 0.529 ± 0.275 0.669 ± 0.135 0.54 ± 0.206 0.598 ± 0.273 0.395 ± 0.246 0.223 ± 0.195 0.527 ± 0.167
ASSD (mm) (↓) Ours 4.009 ± 1.118 4.775 ± 2.522 4.534 ± 2.195 5.299 ± 1.883 5.468 ± 1.856 6.713 ± 3.233 7.463 ± 3.14 5.466 ± 1.613
2D UNet 4.585 ± 3.501 6.665 ± 5.147 5.204 ± 3.3 10.638 ± 6.918 4.12 ± 2.493 8.36 ± 7.738 7.914 ± 9.257 6.784 ± 3.951
3D UNet 3.498 ± 2.47 4.841 ± 5.061 3.228 ± 2.945 8.537 ± 5.393 5.234 ± 2.466 10.022 ± 6.599 11.643 ± 8.608 6.715 ± 3.091
Voxel2Mesh 5.104 ± 1.767 7.105 ± 3.082 6.763 ± 2.528 6.945 ± 3.163 7.775 ± 4.613 9.181 ± 4.593 12.079 ± 7.703 7.85 ± 2.881