Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 17;11(18):5471. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185471

Table 4.

Comparison of the results of the painDETECT items between patients with low and normal HGS #.

PainDETECT Items Low HGS Group
(n = 978)
Normal HGS Group
(n = 1621)
p-Value
Gradation of pain (score of ≥3/5), n
 Burning sensation 113 (11.6) 180 (11.1) 0.725
 Tingling sensation 424 (43.4) 706 (43.6) 0.921
 Pain by light touch 85 (8.7) 105 (6.5) 0.036
 Electric shock-like pain 326 (33.3) 519 (32.0) 0.488
 Pain on cold/heat stimulation 54 (5.5) 45 (2.8) <0.001
 Numbness 178 (18.2) 249 (15.4) 0.058
 Pain by slight pressure 222 (22.7) 345 (21.3) 0.397
Pain course pattern, n
 Persistent pain with slight fluctuation 491 (50.2) 884 (54.5) 0.032
 Persistent pain with pain attacks 266 (27.2) 392 (24.2) 0.087
 Pain attacks without pain between them  151 (15.4) 258 (15.9) 0.747
 Pain attacks with pain between them 70 (7.2) 87 (5.4) 0.063
Radiating pain, n 387 (39.6) 572 (35.3) 0.029
Categorization by total score, n
 ≤12 784 (80.2) 1376 (84.9)
 13–18 140 (14.3) 179 (11.0)
 ≥19 54 (5.5) 66 (4.1)
Total PainDETECT score 7.32 ± 6.28 6.73 ± 5.65 0.016

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number of patients (%). HGS, handgrip strength. # The study population was divided into two groups: normal HGS (≥28 kg for men and ≥18 kg for women) and low HGS (<28 kg for men and <18 kg for women), according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 guideline [1].