Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 20;10:e13318. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13318

Table 1. Intercepts and standard error from high metabolic load distance profile attending to competitive level.

Variables Total First division Second division Comparison r2
HMLD (m) 2,347 (10.9) 2,350 (12.7) 2,344 (13.0) 0.668 0.64
HMLD1 (m) 1,212 (5.8) 1,218 (6.8) 1,206 (7.2) 0.104 0.62
HMLD2 (m) 1,134 (5.4) 1,132 (6.5) 1,134 (6.6) 0.741 0.54
HMLDmin (m·min−1) 26.5 (0.1) 26.7 (0.1) 26.2 (0.1) 0.018* 0.61
HMLD1min (m·min−1) 26.3 (0.1) 26.4 (0.1) 26.2 (0.1) 0.221 0.63
HMLD2min (m·min−1) 25.7 (0.1) 25.9 (0.1) 25.5 (0.2) 0.043* 0.55

Note:

HMLD, High Metabolic Load Distance; HMLD1, High Metabolic Load Distance during the first half of the matches; HMLD2, High Metabolic Load Distance during the second half of the matches; HMLDmin, High Metabolic Load Distance per minute; HMLD1min, High Metabolic Load Distance during the first half of the matches per minute; HMLD2min, High Metabolic Load Distance during the second half of the matches per minute.

*

Differences between divisions (significant level was set at p < .05).