Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;8(9):963. doi: 10.3390/jof8090963

Table 1.

The susceptibility of planktonic- and biofilm-forming cells of F. pedrosoi and P. verrucosa to antifungal agents.

F. pedrosoi
MIC (µM/mg/L)
P. verrucosa
MIC (µM/mg/L)
Antifungal Agents Planktonic Biofilm bMIC/MIC Planktonic Biofilm bMIC/MIC
Amphotericin B 6.25/5.78 200/185 32× 3.12/2.88 25/23
Ketoconazole 0.39/0.21 800/425 2051× 50/27 400/213
Itraconazole 0.19/0.13 >800/>560 >4200× 0.19/0.13 >800/>560 >4200×
Posaconazole 0.04/0.03 >800/>600 >20.000× 0.01/0.007 400/280 40.000×
Terbinafine 0.78/0.23 >800/>230 >1000× 0.04/0.01 >800/>230 >20.000×

Planktonic cells (1 × 104) and mature biofilm (initial inoculum of 1 × 104) were treated with different antifungal agents. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as 100% growth inhibition using visual inspection as recommended by CLSI [56] and confirmed with XTT colorimetric assay [24]. The calculation considered the minimum drug concentration not able to promote the XTT reduction, representing cells metabolically inactivate and/or nonviable. The MIC was expressed in both micromolars (µM) and milligrams per liter (mg/L). (↑) Represents the order of magnitude, in which biofilm MIC (bMIC) was higher than the MIC of planktonic cells. Biofilm-forming cells of F. pedrosoi and P. verrucosa showed significantly higher MICs (p < 0.05) than planktonic cells for all tested antifungal agents.