TABLE 2.
E. coli strain (no.) | % similarityb to strain no:
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
ECOR43 (1) | 100 | 98.1 | 98.1 | 96.1 | 98.1 | 98.1 | |
ECOR31 (2) | 96.1 | 98.1 | 98.1 | 96.1 | 98.1 | 98.1 | |
ECOR42 (3) | 94.6 | 96.8 | 100 | 96.5 | 100 | 100 | |
ECOR37 (4) | 91.1 | 92.3 | 94.0 | 96.5 | 100 | 100 | |
ECOR44 (5) | 94.5 | 93.7 | 95.4 | 93.7 | 96.5 | 96.5 | |
O157:H7c (6) | 93.2 | 92.9 | 93.7 | 98.1 | 93.2 | 100 | |
O55:H7d (7) | 90.5 | 91.7 | 93.4 | 98.9 | 93.7 | 97.1 |
Genetic distances were derived from pairwise sequence comparisons using the Jukes-Cantor correction (29).
UR values are given above the diagonal, while mutS values are given below the diagonal.
Represented by strain FDA536.
Represented by strain DEC5C.