Abstract
Genetic polymorphisms affect lipid profiles and are associated with disease complications. Genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene are associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this study, we investigated the effects of VDR genotypes on the lipid profile and disease complications of T2DM patients in a Jordanian population. Ninety T2DM patients were genotyped for four major functional VDR genetic variants, rs2228570 C > T (FokI), rs7975232 A > C (ApaI), rs731236 T > C (TaqI), and rs1544410 C > T (BsmI), using the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Lipid profiles and diabetes complications were analyzed and correlated with VDR genotypes. We found that the VDR rs7975232 and rs1544410 alleles were significantly (p = 0.008–0.04) associated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels and retinopathy among patients. Carriers of the rs7975232 A/A genotype exhibited higher levels (49.68 ± 15.86 mg/dL) of HDL than patients with the A/C (44.73 ± 13.38 mg/dL) and C/C (37.93 ± 9.22 mg/dL) genotypes. Moreover, carriers of the rs1544410 T/T genotype had higher levels of HDL (54.31 ± 16.45 mg/dL) than patients with the C/T (43.57 ± 13.24 mg/dL) and C/C (43.98 ± 13.17 mg/dL) genotypes. T2DM patients who carry the rs7975232 C/C genotype were at higher risk (odds ratio [OR] = 7.88) of developing retinopathy compared with carriers of the rs7975232 C/A and A/A genotypes. In addition, T2DM patients with the rs1544410 C/C genotype had a higher risk (OR = 4.21) of developing retinopathy than patients with the rs1544410 C/T and T/T genotypes. Therefore, we concluded that the VDR rs7975232 and rs1544410 alleles were associated with HDL levels and retinopathy and can be considered as potential genetic biomarkers for the lipid profile and retinopathy complication among T2DM patients in a Jordanian population of Arabic origin. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.
Keywords: diabetes, HDL, Jordanians, retinopathy, VDR gene
1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease caused by insufficient insulin production, cellular insulin resistance, or both [1]. The long-term effects of diabetes can damage small (microvascular) and large (macrovascular) blood vessels throughout the body [2], which in turn harms the eyes, kidneys, nerves, and the cardiovascular system [3]. The lipid profile is disturbed in DM patients, characterized by elevated levels of triglycerides (TGs) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), as well as low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) [2]. These lipid changes can increase the cardiovascular risk of DM patients [3].
There are many risk factors for DM, including environmental and genetic factors. For example, genetic variants in inflammatory interleukins and the peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor are associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications [4,5].
Vitamin D plays a significant role in homeostasis; it reduces inflammation [6] and hyperlipidemia [7]. A recent study showed that vitamin D could modulate Sars-Cov2 entry genes in the lungs [8]. Vitamin D deficiency is a cause of many disorders, including DM and dyslipidemia [9]. Vitamin D exerts its effects by binding the vitamin D receptor, a nuclear receptor that regulates the expression of many genes [10]. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is encoded by the VDR gene located on chromosome 12 and is comprised of eight protein-encoding exons and six untranslated exons [11]. Genetic variants in the VDR gene can affect the function of the VDR and the vitamin D response [12]. The major functional VDR genetic variants are FokI (rs2228570, +30920 C > T), ApaI (rs7975232, +64978 A > C), TaqI (rs731236, +65058 T > C), and BsmI (rs1544410, +63980 C > T). The FoxI and TaqI variants are exonic, while the ApaI and BsmI variants are intronic. These VDR variant alleles have been linked to the levels of, and response to, vitamin D, and are associated with inflammatory and immune diseases, such as asthma and DM [13,14].
In a Jordanian study, Khdair et al. investigated the frequency of VDR FokI, ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI genotypes among type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients [15. They found no difference in the frequency of these major VDR genotypes between TIDM patients and healthy volunteers [15]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study regarding the influence of VDR genotype on T2DM among Jordanians. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the VDR FokI, ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI genotypes on the lipid profile and major diabetes complications of T2DM patients of Jordanian Arabic origin.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemical Compounds
DNA primers were designed and obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA). A Wizard genomic DNA extraction kit, 100-base pair (bp) ladder, and PCR master mix were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Agarose gel and gel electrophoresis buffer (10× Tris-EDTA-borate buffer) were purchased from BioBasic (Markham, ON, Canada). RedSafe dye was purchased from iNtRON Biotechnology (Seongnam, South Korea).
2.2. Study Participants
The study design is summarized in Figure 1. Approximately 5 mL of blood was collected into EDTA tubes from 90 T2DM patients attending the University of Jordan Hospital from October 2021 to February 2022. The patients all had T2DM for ≥1 year and were diagnosed based on the 2021 diagnostic criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for T2DM (HbA1C% ≥ 6.5) [16]. The patients were under medical care for T2DM and medical records were available at the hospital. The patients were not on vitamin D therapy. The study protocol was explained in detail to all volunteers, and written informed consent was obtained.
Figure 1.
The flowchart of the research design.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: aged < 16 years, on vitamin D therapy, current pregnancy, and the presence of chronic comorbidities unrelated to diabetes complications, such as cancer, asthma, or rheumatoid arthritis. Ethical approval was provided by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Jordan Hospital (reference number: 129/2022).
2.3. Data Collection
Demographic data, blood lipid and glucose profiles, and total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, TG, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c%) data were obtained from the University of Jordan Hospital. Information regarding diabetes complications, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy, were obtained from the patients’ medical records. The diagnosis of T2DM patients and identification of diabetes complications were performed by endocrinologists at the University of Jordan Hospital according to the guidelines of the ADA [16].
2.4. Genotyping of VDR Variants
Genomic DNA was extracted from each blood sample according to the manufacturer’s instructions using a Wizard DNA extraction kit. Then, the DNA samples were subjected to VDR gene amplification using a T100 thermal cycler (model number: 1861096; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Briefly, 100 ng of genomic DNA was added to a reaction mixture containing 10 pmol forward and 10 pmol reverse oligo DNA primers (Table 1), and 1 unit of Taq polymerase, in a standard buffer in a final volume of 50 µL. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 57 °C for 1 min, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min. To verify the amplification of VDR gene fragments, gel electrophoresis was carried out at 125 A for 30 min using 2.5% agarose gel. The bands were visualized following exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light with a wavelength of 302 nm using a benchtop UV transilluminator (BioDoc-Itt; Antylia Scientific, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The expected sizes of the DNA fragments containing VDR FokI, ApaI + TaqI, and BsmI are 245, 745, and 823 bp (Supplementary Figure S1).
Table 1.
Primer sequences and annealing temperatures used for PCR amplification of the VDR gene.
| Primer | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| FokI F | AGTTGGCCCTGGCACTGACTCTGCTCT | 245 |
| FokI R | ATGGAAACACCTTGCTTCTTCTCC CTC | |
| ApaI-TaqI F | CAGAGCATGGACAGGGAGCAA | 745 |
| ApaI-TaqI R | GCAACTCCTCATGGCTGAGGTCTC | |
| BsmI F | AACCAGCGGGAAGAG GTCAAGGG | 823 |
| BsmI R | CAACCAAGACTACAAGTACCGCGTCAG |
F, forward primer; R, reverse primer; bp, base pair.
The VDR DNA fragments were subjected to restriction enzyme digestion using FoxI, ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI, to assess the VDR FoxI, ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI genotypes, respectively. Digestion was confirmed by gel electrophoresis using a 3.5% agarose gel. Digestion of the wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous VDR FoxI genotypes produced a band of 245 bp; three bands of 245, 200, and 45 bp; and two bands of 200 and 45 bp, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2A). Digestion of the wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous VDR ApaI genotypes produced a band of 745 bp; three bands of 745, 527, and 218 bp, and two bands of 527 and 218 bp, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2B). Digestion of the wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous VDR TaqI genotype produced two bands of 497 and 248 bp; four bands of 497, 296, 248, and 201 bp; and three bands of 296, 248, and 201 bp, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2C). Digestion of wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous VDR BsmI genotypes produced two bands of 638 and 185 bp; three bands of 823, 638, and 185 bp; and a single band of 823 bp, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2D).
2.5. In-Silico Analysis of the Promoter Sequence
Vitamin D response elements (VDREs) were predicted in the promoter sequences of the human APOA1 gene, which encodes the major protein in HDL, using the online tool PROMO (version 8.3) and TRANSFAC database [17]. The DNA sequence of the promoter region of the human APOA1 gene was obtained from the Eukaryotic Promoter Database (https://epd.epfl.ch//index.php, accessed on 29 July 2022) [18]. The promoter DNA sequence used for in-silico prediction corresponds to 1000 nucleotides before the transcriptional start site in the 5′-flanking region of the human APOA1 gene.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version X7; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of the biochemical data was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Deviation of the frequency of the VDR genotype from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and the frequency data for diabetes complications, were analyzed using the Chi-square test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test was used to analyze the lipid profiles. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine differences in the levels of HbA1C% and creatinine according to VDR genotype. p-values ˂ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Patient Data
Blood cell data, biochemical parameters, lipid profiles, and information regarding diabetes complications were collected from 90 patients (males, n = 40; females, n = 50; Table 2). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of the participants was 63.43 ± 13.62 years. The average levels of LDL, HDL, and TGs were 105.17 ± 41.16, 45.69 ± 14.18, and 165.28 ± 86.29 mg/dL, respectively (Table 2). The average HbA1c and creatinine levels were 7.57 ± 1.71% and 0.95 ± 0.49 mg/dL, respectively.
Table 2.
Demographic and clinical data of the diabetic patients.
| Demographic Data | Value |
|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) | 63.43 ± 13.62 years |
| Sex (%) | 40 (44.4) males, 50 (44.6) females |
| Biochemical parameters (mean ± SD) | |
| HbcA1 | 7.57 ± 1.71% |
| LDL | 105.17 ± 41.16 mg/dL |
| HDL | 45.69 ± 14.18 mg/dL |
| TG | 165.28 ± 86.29 mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 0.95 ± 0.49 mg/dL |
| Diabetic complications (%) | |
| Cardiovascular disease | 55 (55.6) |
| Retinopathy | 10 (11.1) |
| Nephropathy | 12 (13.3) |
| Neuropathy | 16 (17.8) |
More than half of the patients (55.6%) were suffering from CVD. In addition, 11.1% had retinopathy complications while 13.3% had chronic kidney diseases. Lastly, 17.8% of the patients exhibited diabetic neuropathy.
3.2. VDR Genotypes of T2DM Patients
Table 3 shows the frequency of the VDR FoxI, ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI genotypes among this sample of T2DM patients. The frequencies of the wild-type, hetero-, and homozygous FoxI genotypes were 45.1%, 43.30%, and 11.18%, respectively. The allele frequency of the FoxI C > T allele was 32%. The frequencies of the wild-type, hetero-, and homozygous ApaI genotypes were 27.8%, 57.8%, and 11.1%, respectively. The allele frequency of the ApaI A > C allele was 41%. The frequencies of the wild-type, hetero-, and homozygous TaqI genotypes were 41.1%, 42.2%, and 13.3%, respectively. The allele frequency of the TaqI T > C allele was 36%. Lastly, the frequencies of the wild-type, hetero-, and homozygous BsmI genotypes were 30%, 52.2%, and 17.8%, respectively. The allele frequency of the BsmI C > T allele was 44%. All frequencies of VDR variant alleles were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, with p-values > 0.05 (Chi-square test).
Table 3.
Frequencies of VDR FoxI, ApaI, Taq1, and BsmI genotypes among T2DM patients.
| VDR Genetic Variants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | FokI | ApaI | Taq1 | BsmI |
| Wild-type | 41 (45.61%) | 25 (27.8%) | 37 (41.1%) | 27 (30%) |
| Heterozygous | 39 (43.30%) | 52 (57.8%) | 38 (42.2%) | 47 (52.2%) |
| Homozygous | 10 (11.18%) | 10 (11.1%) | 12 (13.3%) | 16 (17.8%) |
| Missing data a | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Allele frequency | ||||
| Observed | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.44 |
a The missing data are unclear VDR genotyping results.
3.3. VDR Haplotype and Linkage Disequilibrium among T2DM Patients
The most common VDR haplotype was FokI T, ApaI C, TaqI T, and BsmI C with a frequency of 27% (Table 4). FokI T, ApaI A, TaqI C, and BsmI T was the second most common VDR haplotype, with a frequency of 25%. The least common VDR haplotype was FokI T, ApaI A, TaqI C, and BsmI C, with a frequency of 1% (Table 4). We found that ApaI was in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the TaqI variant, with a D’ of 94 (Figure 2). In addition, ApaI was in LD with the BsmI variant, with a D’ of 87. LD was also evident between the TaqI and BsmI variants, with a D’ of 90. Lastly, the FokI variant was not in LD with the other VDR variants studied (Figure 2).
Table 4.
Frequency of VDR FoxI, Apa1, Taq1, and BsmI haplotypes among diabetic patients.
| VDR Variant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FokI | ApaI | Taq1 | BsmI | Frequency a |
| T | C | T | C | 0.27 |
| T | A | C | T | 0.25 |
| C | A | C | T | 0.13 |
| T | C | C | T | 0.10 |
| C | C | C | T | 0.08 |
| C | C | T | C | 0.08 |
| T | C | C | C | 0.04 |
| C | A | C | C | 0.02 |
| C | C | C | C | 0.02 |
| T | A | C | C | 0.01 |
a The frequency of each haplotype was calculated using the Haploview program.
Figure 2.
Linkage disequilibrium (LD) of the FokI (rs2228570 C > T), ApaI (rs7975232 A > C), TaqI (rs731236 T > C), and BsmI (rs1544410 C > T) VDR alleles in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. LD was determined using Haploview software. Red squares represent a strong LD, and white squares a weak LD. The blue square indicates no LD.
3.4. Associations of VDR Genotypes with Lipid, Glycemic, and Creatinine Levels
Table 5 shows the associations of the VDR FokI, ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI genotypes with lipid, glycemic, and creatinine levels in Jordanian T2DM patients. Neither the FokI nor TaqI genotype was associated with lipid, glycemic, or creatinine levels among T2DM patients. However, the ApaI and BsmI genotypes were significantly (p = 0.02–0.03) associated with HDL levels. Carriers of the wild-type ApaI A/A genotype had significantly higher levels (49.68 ± 15.86 mg/dL) of HDL than patients with heterozygous ApaI A/C (44.73 ± 13.38 mg/dL) and homozygous ApaI C/C (37.93 ± 9.22 mg/dL) genotypes. Carriers of the BsmI T/T genotype had significantly higher levels of HDL (54.31 ± 16.45 mg/dL) than those with the BsmI C/C (43.57 ± 13.24) or BsmI T/C (43.98 ± 13.17 mg/dL) genotype.
Table 5.
Associations of VDR FokI, ApaI, Taq1, and BsmI variants with the biochemical parameters of T2DM patients.
| VDR Variant | Biochemical Parameter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FokI genotype | HbA1C (%) |
LDL (mg/dL) |
HDL (mg/dL) |
TG (mg/dL) |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
| Wild-type | 7.75 ± 2.04 | 106.51 ± 39.15 | 47.17 ± 14.14 | 184.07 ± 102.8 | 0.98 ± 0.57 |
| Heterozygous | 7.34 ± 1.41 | 100.85 ± 38.13 | 43.91 ± 13.98 | 149.17 ± 69.98 | 0.93 ± 0.41 |
| Homozygous | 7.76 ± 1.25 | 116.50 ± 59.79 | 46.6 ± 15.81 | 151.20 ± 55.29 | 0.87 ± 0.41 |
| p-value | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.17 | 0.73 |
| ApaI genotype | HbA1C (%) |
LDL (mg/dL) |
HDL (mg/dL) |
TG (mg/dL) |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
| Wild-type | 7.94 ± 2.16 | 113.2 ± 40.19 | 49.68 ± 15.86 | 177.48 ± 86.83 | 1.05 ± 0.69 |
| Heterozygous | 7.5 ± 1.55 | 104.31 ± 41.64 | 44.73 ± 13.38 | 161.32 ± 90.57 | 0.92 ± 0.40 |
| Homozygous | 7.11 ± 1.39 | 104.93 ± 36 | 37.93 ± 9.22 | 165.42 ± 54.67 | 0.92 ± 0.34 |
| p-value | 0.39 | 0.66 | 0.03 * | 0.52 | 0.52 |
| Taq1 genotype | HbA1C (%) |
LDL (mg/dL) |
HDL (mg/dL) |
TG (mg/dL) |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
| Wild-type | 7.26 ± 1.48 | 108.71 ± 42.86 | 44.47 ± 12.02 | 161.65 ± 73.17 | 0.88 ± 0.33 |
| Heterozygous | 7.65 ± 1.53 | 104.21 ± 37.12 | 44.53 ± 13.51 | 165.96 ± 101.94 | 1.02 ± 0.64 |
| Homozygous | 8.45 ± 2.62 | 109.58 ± 45.75 | 50.92 ± 20.44 | 178.41 ± 75.22 | 0.98 ± 0.35 |
| p-value | 0.11 | 0.87 | 0.34 | 0.85 | 0.47 |
| BsmI genotype | HbA1C (%) |
LDL (mg/dL) |
HDL (mg/dL) |
TG (mg/dL) |
Creatinine (mg/dL) |
| Wild-type | 7.28 ± 1.55 | 104.01 ± 39.34 | 43.57 ± 13.24 | 154.23 ± 72.39 | 0.77 ± 0.23 |
| Heterozygous | 7.59 ± 1.49 | 106.38 ± 41.13 | 43.98 ± 13.17 | 168.54 ± 97.95 | 1.00 ± 0.46 |
| Homozygous | 8.00 ± 2.44 | 103.56 ± 46.11 | 54.31 ± 16.45 | 174.43 ± 72.97 | 1.08 ± 0.77 |
| p-value | 0.41 | 0.96 | 0.02 * | 0.71 | 0.08 |
* Indicates a significant difference (p-value < 0.0), according to one-way ANOVA of lipid parameters and Kruskal–Wallis test of HbA1C% and creatinine levels.
3.5. Associations of VDR Genotypes with Diabetes Complications
The associations of VDR FoxI, ApaI, Taq1, and BsmI genotypes with T2DM are illustrated in Table 6. VDR FoxI and TaqI genotypes were not associated with diabetes complications. On the other hand, the ApaI and BsmI genotypes were both significantly associated with retinopathy. Patients with the ApaI C/C genotype had a significantly (p = 0.008) higher risk of developing retinopathy compared with patients with the ApaI A/C and A/A genotypes. In addition, T2DM patients with the BsmI T/T genotype had a significantly (p = 0.04) higher risk of developing retinopathy compared with those with the BsmI T/C or C/C genotype.
Table 6.
Associations of VDR FoxI, ApaI, Taq1, and BsmI variants with diabetes complications.
| VDR Variant | Diabetes Complication | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FoxI genotype | Cardiovascular disease |
Neuropathy | Retinopathy | Nephropathy | ||||
| yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | |
| Wild-type | 25 | 16 | 9 | 32 | 5 | 36 | 5 | 36 |
| Heterozygous | 21 | 18 | 5 | 34 | 5 | 34 | 5 | 34 |
| Homozygous | 4 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| p-value | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.80 | ||||
| ApaI genotype | Cardiovascular disease |
Neuropathy | Retinopathy | Nephropathy | ||||
| yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | |
| Wild-type | 13 | 12 | 7 | 18 | 3 | 22 | 3 | 22 |
| Heterozygous | 32 | 20 | 9 | 43 | 3 | 49 | 6 | 46 |
| Homozygous | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| p-value | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.008 * | 0.29 | ||||
| Taq1 genotype | Cardiovascular disease |
Neuropathy | Retinopathy | Nephropathy | ||||
| yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | |
| Wild-type | 19 | 18 | 3 | 34 | 6 | 31 | 5 | 32 |
| Heterozygous | 24 | 14 | 11 | 27 | 2 | 36 | 5 | 33 |
| Homozygous | 6 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| p-value | 0.53 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.89 | ||||
| BsmI genotype | Cardiovascular disease |
Neuropathy | Retinopathy | Nephropathy | ||||
| yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | |
| Wild-type | 14 | 13 | 3 | 24 | 6 | 21 | 4 | 23 |
| Heterozygous | 29 | 18 | 9 | 38 | 2 | 45 | 6 | 41 |
| Homozygous | 7 | 9 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 14 |
| p-value | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.04 * | 0.96 | ||||
* Indicates a significant difference (p-value < 0.05), according to the Chi-square test.
3.6. In-Silico Prediction of VDREs in Promoter Sequences
Table 7 shows the results of predictions of VDREs in the promoter sequence of the human APOA1 gene. Two different VDRE sequences, ACCC and GGGT, were identified at multiple positions in the APOA1 gene promoter.
Table 7.
VDREs in the promoter sequence of the human APOA1 gene.
| Gene | VDRE Position in the Promoter # | VDRE Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| Human APOA1 | −5 to −8 | ACCC |
| −341 to −344 | GGGT | |
| −735 to −738 | ACCC | |
| −741 to −744 | ACCC | |
| −746 to −749 | ACCC | |
| −795 to −798 | ACCC | |
| −802 to −805 | ACCC | |
| −956 to −959 | ACCC |
# The position of VDREs in the promoter sequence is relative to the transcriptional start site of the human APOA1 gene.
4. Discussion
Variants in the VDR gene influence the binding of vitamin D to its receptor, thereby affecting responses to vitamin D, and ultimately causing physiological disorders [19]. In this study, we investigated the influence of major VDR genotypes on lipid profiles and diabetes complications in a sample of T2DM patients of Jordanian Arabic origin. This study is the first done regarding the influence of VDR genotype on T2DM of the Jordanian Arabic population. The VDR variants ApaI A > C and BsmI C > T were significantly associated with HDL levels and retinopathy. This suggests the possibility that the VDR variants ApaI C > A and BsmI C > T could be used as genetic biomarkers for retinopathy and HDL levels among T2DM patients of Jordanian Arabic origin.
The average levels of HbAc1 and lipid profiles of the diabetes patients in this study were close to the targeted values, after diabetes medications, depending on the guideline of the American Diabetes Association [16]. This could be because our T2DM patients were on diabetic medications, such as metformin and glimepiride, as well as antihyperlipidemic drugs such as statins [20,21]. These medications may have affected the associations of VDR genotypes with biochemical profiles and diabetes complications.
The major T2DM complication among our patients was cardiovascular complications, consistent with previous studies of T2DM patients [22,23]. The prevalence of retinopathy (11.1%) in this study was lower than that reported by Al-Amer et al. (34%) in another study of Jordanians with T2DM [24]. However, the frequencies of diabetes complications observed in this study were within the ranges reported globally [25].
The present study is not the first study conducted in Jordan to investigate the influence of VDR genotypes on diabetes. Khdair et al. analyzed the frequency of VDR genotypes and haplotypes among T1DM patients and compared these frequencies with those of healthy controls [15]. Similar findings were observed in terms of VDR genotype, haplotype, and LD among our T2DM patients: the frequency of VDR FoxI, ApaI, and Taq1 genotypes observed in T2DM patients was similar to that reported previously among T1DM and healthy volunteers; the haplotypes VDR FoxI T/ApaI C/Taq1 T/BsmI C and FoxI T/ApaI A/Taq1 C/BsmI T were the major VDR haplotypes in T2DM patients, as well as T1DM patients and healthy controls; and the VDR ApaI, TaqI, and BsmI variants were in strong LD, while FoxI was in weak LD, with other VDR variants in T1DM and T2DM patients. However, the frequency of the homozygous VDR BsmI genotype among the T2DM patients in this study (0.18) was significantly (Chi-square test, p value < 0.05) higher than that reported by Khdair et al. in T1DM patients (0.06) [15]. Further studies of the frequency of VDR genotypes and haplotypes among both T1DM and T2DM patients in Jordan are needed, with larger patient cohorts.
Several studies have reported associations of VDR variants with lipid profiles [26,27,28]. The VDR ApaI and BsmI genotypes were only associated with HDL levels in our T2DM patients. The VDR genotype has previously been shown to significantly influence HDL levels in T2DM patients [29,30]. On the other hand, some studies found no association between VDR genotypes and HDL levels [31,32]. We analyzed (in silico) the promoter region of the APOA1 gene, which encodes the major protein in HDL, and found several binding sites for the VDR in the promoter region; this indicates that the human APOA1 gene is influenced by vitamin D, and that genetic variants in VDR may influence the molecular response to vitamin D on the transcription of the APOA1 gene, as well as HDL levels. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of vitamin D and VDR variants on RNA and protein levels of APOA1 and HDL.
In the present study, the VDR ApaI and BsmI genotypes were associated with retinopathy in T2DM patients. Patients with the homozygous ApaI C/C genotype had a 7.88-fold increased risk of developing retinopathy compared with patients with the ApaI A/A and BsmI T/T genotypes, while patients with the homozygous BsmI C/C genotype had a 4.21-fold increased risk. Assis et al. also reported an association of VDR variants with diabetic retinopathy in T2DM [31]. The BsmI allele was also associated with diabetic retinopathy in Korean DM patients [33]. The mechanism underlying the role of VDR ApaI A > C and BsmI C > T variants in diabetic retinopathy remains unclear. However, in the present study, the ApaI and BsmI variants were associated with both HDL levels and retinopathy. Therefore, the increased risk of retinopathy among patients with VDR ApaI and BsmI variant alleles may be related to the significant variation in HDL levels. In the recent NO BLIND study, Sasso et al. suggested that HDL levels are a risk factor for retinopathy in DM patients [34].
The results of this study do not support previous reports in which VDR variants were identified as risk factors for the development of renal-, neuro-, and cardiovascular complications [35,36,37]. The discordance between our results and previous studies may be due to differences in study design, or to ethnic differences between Jordanians and other studied populations, such as Asians and Europeans.
There were some limitations to this study. First, the sample size was relatively small and this study is considered a pilot study. Therefore, further clinical genetic studies with larger samples are needed to confirm our findings. Second, certain rare VDR variant genotypes were not included in this study. Sequencing the entire VDR gene and identifying its structure in T2DM patients will be important. Lastly, the blood levels of vitamin D were not analyzed, which could have helped elucidate the correlations of VDR genotype with vitamin D levels, diabetes complications, and lipid profiles.
5. Conclusions
The VDR ApaI and BsmI genotypes are associated with HDL levels and retinopathy among T2DM patients of Jordanian Arabic origin. Further clinical genetic studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the findings of this study.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan and The University of Jordan for supporting this research.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jpm12091488/s1, Figure S1: The PCR products of VDR gene fragments containing Fox1 (A), ApaI and TaqI (B), and BsmI (C); Figure S2: Genotyping of VDR major genetic alleles using PCR-FRLP.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.J., S.-J.L. and H.A. (Hussam Alhawari); methodology, Y.J., H.A. (Hussam Alhawari) and D.A.; formal analysis, Y.J., D.A., H.A. (Hussein Alhawari), M.A., S.A. and M.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A. (Hussam Alhawari), M.M., Y.J., S.A., S.J.A., M.N.O. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, S.-J.L., S.A. and R.K.F.; supervision, Y.J. and S.-J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The ethical approval was provided by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Jordan Hospital with a reference number of 129/2022.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data are available with the corresponding authors upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
The article was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Korean government (NRF-2020R1I1A3073778).
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kharroubi A.T., Darwish H.M. Diabetes mellitus: The epidemic of the century. World J. Diabetes. 2015;6:850–867. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hirano T. Pathophysiology of Diabetic Dyslipidemia. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2018;25:771–782. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Basa A.L., Garber A.J. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes: Modifying risk factors other than glucose control. Ochsner. J. 2001;3:132–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khodaeian M., Enayati S., Tabatabaei-Malazy O., Amoli M.M. Association between Genetic Variants and Diabetes Mellitus in Iranian Populations: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. J. Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:585917. doi: 10.1155/2015/585917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kruzliak P., Haley A.P., Starcevic J.N., Gaspar L., Petrovic D. Polymorphisms of the peroxisome prolifera-tor-activated receptor-gamma (rs1801282) and its coactivator-1 (rs8192673) are associated with obesity indexes in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2015;14:42. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0197-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aranow C. Vitamin D and the Immune System. J. Investig. Med. 2011;59:881–886. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e31821b8755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Surdu A., Pînzariu O., Ciobanu D.-M., Negru A.-G., Căinap S.-S., Lazea C., Iacob D., Săraci G., Tirinescu D., Borda I., et al. Vitamin D and Its Role in the Lipid Metabolism and the Development of Atherosclerosis. Biomedicines. 2021;9:172. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9020172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alruwaili M.A., Jarrar Y. Effects of vitamin C and D on the mRNA expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor, cathepsin L, and transmembrane serine protease in the mouse lungs. Libyan J. Med. 2022;17:2054111. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2022.2054111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li Y., Tong C.H., Rowland C.M., Radcliff J., Bare L.A., McPhaul M.J., Devlin J.J. Association of changes in lipid levels with changes in vitamin D levels in a real-world setting. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:21536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01064-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pike J.W., Meyer M.B. The Vitamin D Receptor: New Paradigms for the Regulation of Gene Expression by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2010;39:255–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marozik P., Rudenka A., Kobets K., Rudenka E. Vitamin D Status, Bone Mineral Density, and VDR Gene Poly-morphism in a Cohort of Belarusian Postmenopausal Women. Nutrients. 2021;13:837. doi: 10.3390/nu13030837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vishnupriya S., Bindu C.H., Annamaneni S., Reddy K.P. Association of vitamin D receptor gene start codon (Fok1) polymorphism with high myopia. Oman J. Ophthalmol. 2011;4:57–62. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.83654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kılıç S., Sılan F., Hız M.M., Işık S., Ögretmen Z., Özdemir O. Vitamin D Receptor Gene BSMI, FOKI, APAI, and TAQI Polymorphisms and the Risk of Atopic Dermatitis. J. Investig. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016;26:106–110. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khan A., Khan S., Aman A., Ali Y., Jamal M., Rahman B., Ahmad M., Aasim M., Jalil F., Shah A.A. Associa-tion of VDR Gene Variant (rs1544410) with Type 2 Diabetes in a Pakistani Cohort. Balkan J. Med. Genet. 2019;22:59–64. doi: 10.2478/bjmg-2019-0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khdair S.I., Jarrar Y.B., Jarrar W. Immunogenetic Prediction of VDR Gene SNPs: Lack of Association with Sus-ceptibility to Type 1 Diabetes in Jordanian Patients. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2021;14:4079–4087. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S333005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.American Diabetes A. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S14–S31. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Farré D., Roset R., Huerta M., Adsuara J.E., Roselló L., Albà M.M., Messeguer X. Identification of patterns in biological sequences at the ALGGEN server: PROMO and MALGEN. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3651–3653. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Périer R.C., Junier T., Bonnard C., Bucher P. The Eukaryotic Promoter Database (EPD): Recent developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:307–309. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sirajudeen S., Shah I., Al Menhali A. A Narrative Role of Vitamin D and Its Receptor: With Current Evidence on the Gastric Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3832. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alhawari H., Jarrar Y., Alkhatib M.A., Alhawari H., Momani M., Zayed A., Alkamhawi R., Zihlif M. The Association of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase, Apolipoprotein E, and Solute Carrier Organic Anion Genetic Variants with Atorvastatin Response among Jordanian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Life. 2020;10:232. doi: 10.3390/life10100232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abed E., Jarrar Y., Alhawari H., Abdullah S., Zihlif M. How the cytochrome 7a1 (CYP7A1) and ATP-binding cassette G8 (ABCG8) genetic variants affect atorvastatin response among type 2 diabetic patients attending the University of Jordan Hospital. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021;59:99–108. doi: 10.5414/CP203779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nathan D.M. Long-Term Complications of Diabetes Mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;328:1676–1685. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306103282306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wu H., Norton V., Cui K., Zhu B., Bhattacharjee S., Lu Y.W., Wang B., Shan D., Wong S., Dong Y., et al. Di-abetes and Its Cardiovascular Complications: Comprehensive Network and Systematic Analyses. Front Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:841928. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.841928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Al-Amer R.M., Khader Y., Malas S., Abu-Yaghi N., Al-Bdour M., Ajlouni K. Prevalence and risk factors of dia-betic retinopathy among Jordanian patients with type 2 diabetes. Digit J. Ophthalmol. 2008;14:42–49. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2008.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bos M., Agyemang C. Prevalence and complications of diabetes mellitus in Northern Africa, a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:387. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jia J., Tang Y., Shen C., Zhang N., Ding H., Zhan Y. Vitamin D receptor polymorphism rs2228570 is significantly associated with risk of dyslipidemia and serum LDL levels in Chinese Han population. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17:193. doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0819-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Al-Daghri N.M., Mohammed A.K., Al-Attas O.S., Ansari M.G.A., Wani K., Hussain S.D., Sabico S., Tripathi G., Alokail M.S. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Modify Cardiometabolic Response to Vitamin D Supplementation in T2DM Patients. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8280. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08621-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Karonova T., Grineva E., Belyaeva O., Bystrova A., Jude E.B., Andreeva A., Kostareva A., Pludowski P. Rela-tionship Between Vitamin D Status and Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Markers of Metabolic Syndrome Among Adults. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:448. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xia Z., Hu Y., Han Z., Gao Y., Bai J., He Y., Zhao H., Zhang H. Association of vitamin D receptor gene pol-ymorphisms with diabetic dyslipidemia in the elderly male population in North China. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2017;12:1673–1679. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S145700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Al-Daghri N.M., Al-Attas O.S., Alkharfy K.M., Khan N., Mohammed A.K., Vinodson B., Ansari M.G.A., Alenad A., Alokail M.S. Association of VDR-gene variants with factors related to the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and vitamin D deficiency. Gene. 2014;542:129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Assis C.S., Diniz T.G., Alcantara J.O.S., Brito V., do Nascimento R.A.F., Nunes M., Silva A.S., de Queiroga Evangelista I.W., Viturino M.G.M., de Lima R., et al. Metabolic impact of the VDR rs1544410 in diabetic retinopathy. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0263346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mackawy A.M., Badawi M.E. Association of vitamin D and vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with chronic inflammation, insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome components in type 2 diabetic Egyptian patients. Meta Gene. 2014;2:540–556. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hong Y.J., Kang E.S., Ji M.J., Choi H.J., Oh T., Koong S.-S., Jeon H.J. Association between Bsm1 Polymorphism in Vitamin D Receptor Gene and Diabetic Retinopathy of Type 2 Diabetes in Korean Population. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;30:469–474. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2015.30.4.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sasso F.C., Pafundi P.C., Gelso A., Bono V., Costagliola C., Marfella R., Sardu C., Rinaldi L., Galiero R., Acierno C., et al. High HDL cholesterol: A risk factor for diabetic retinopathy? Findings from NO BLIND study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019;150:236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nosratabadi R., Arababadi M.K., Salehabad V.A., Shamsizadeh A., Mahmoodi M., Sayadi A.R., Kennedy D. Polymorphisms within exon 9 but not intron 8 of the vitamin D receptor are associated with the nephropathic complication of type-2 diabetes. Int. J. Immunogenet. 2010;37:493–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313X.2010.00953.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang L., Wu L., Fan Y., Ma J. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in association with diabetic nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. Genet. 2017;18:95. doi: 10.1186/s12881-017-0458-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Soroush N., Radfar M., Hamidi A.K., Abdollahi M., Qorbani M., Razi F., Esfahani E.N., Amoli M.M. Vitamin D receptor gene FokI variant in diabetic foot ulcer and its relation with oxidative stress. Gene. 2016;599:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data are available with the corresponding authors upon request.