Table 2.
Treatment | Conc. (µg/L) |
Radial Growth (mm) | Inhibition % | Regression Equation | R² |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cu2ONPs (0.35) | 10 | 7.0 b ±0.54 * | 22.22 f ± 0.56 | Y = 1.7611x − 33.49 | 0.99 |
25 | 5.8 c ± 0.66 | 35.56 e ± 0.76 | |||
50 | 4.6 d ±0.48 | 48.89 d ±0.73 | |||
100 | 2.3 d ± 0.52 | 74.44 b± 0.86 | |||
Cu2ONPs (0.30) | 10 | 6.8 c ± 0.64 | 24.44 d± 0.78 | Y = 1.6779x − 36.244 | 0.981 |
25 | 5.4 e± 0.57 | 38.89 c ± 0.91 | |||
50 | 4.1 f ± 0.43 | 54.44 b ±0.93 | |||
100 | 1.9 f ± 0.39 | 78.89 a± 1.12 | |||
Fungicide (Uniform 390 SE) |
10 | 6.3 d ± 0.67 | 30.0 d ± 0.71 | Y = 1.627x − 43.269 | 0.983 |
25 | 5.1 e ± 0.55 | 43.33 c ± 0.89 | |||
50 | 3.5 f ± 0.45 | 61.11 b± 1.07 | |||
100 | 1.3 f ± 0.41 | 85.56 a± 1.14 | |||
Control | 0 | 9.0 a ± 0.69 | 0.0 g ± 0.19 |
Statistical comparisons were made among treatments within a single column. * The different letters represent significant differences using Fisher’s LSD test at p ≤ 0.05. Each mean value came from three replicates.