Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 28;8(9):911. doi: 10.3390/jof8090911

Table 2.

Radial growth and inhibition percentage of the Cu2ONPs and fungicide against F. solani in vitro with regression equation and degree of correlation.

Treatment Conc.
(µg/L)
Radial Growth (mm) Inhibition % Regression Equation
Cu2ONPs (0.35) 10 7.0 b ±0.54 * 22.22 f ± 0.56 Y = 1.7611x − 33.49 0.99
25 5.8 c ± 0.66 35.56 e ± 0.76
50 4.6 d ±0.48 48.89 d ±0.73
100 2.3 d ± 0.52 74.44 b± 0.86
Cu2ONPs (0.30) 10 6.8 c ± 0.64 24.44 d± 0.78 Y = 1.6779x − 36.244 0.981
25 5.4 e± 0.57 38.89 c ± 0.91
50 4.1 f ± 0.43 54.44 b ±0.93
100 1.9 f ± 0.39 78.89 a± 1.12
Fungicide
(Uniform 390 SE)
10 6.3 d ± 0.67 30.0 d ± 0.71 Y = 1.627x − 43.269 0.983
25 5.1 e ± 0.55 43.33 c ± 0.89
50 3.5 f ± 0.45 61.11 b± 1.07
100 1.3 f ± 0.41 85.56 a± 1.14
Control 0 9.0 a ± 0.69 0.0 g ± 0.19

Statistical comparisons were made among treatments within a single column. * The different letters represent significant differences using Fisher’s LSD test at p ≤ 0.05. Each mean value came from three replicates.