Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;12(9):1345. doi: 10.3390/life12091345

Figure 4.

Figure 4

ROC-plot of benchmarked tools on a spiked dataset. Lines have slight offsets in x- and y-dimensions for reasons of distinguishability. We compared PathoLive to Clinical Pathoscope and Bracken on a human sample containing 7 viruses. PathoLive performs best regarding the ROC-AUC at all sampled times (cycle 40, 60, 80, and 100) when compared to the results of the other tools after sequencing the complete first read (cycle 100).