Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0274327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274327

Table 4. Association of the level of mindful eating with sociodemographic characteristics and clinical profiles (N = 200).

Variable Mindful eating level Crude OR (95% CI) p-valuea β Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-valueb
High n = 101 Low n = 99
Age, mean (SD) 59 (10.0) 55 (11.0) 1.03 (1.01,1.06) 0.01 0.05 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) 0.01
Gender, n (%)
Female 59 (54.6) 49 (45.4) 0.84 (0.82, 2.51) 0.20 -0.55 0.57 (0.30,1.1) 0.90
Male 42 (45.7) 50 (54.3) ref ref
Ethnicity, n (%)
Malay 63 (51.6) 59 (48.4) ref
Non-Malay 38 (48.7) 40 (51.3) 1.07 (0.50, 1.57) 0.69
Education level, n (%)
No formal education 3 (30.0) 7 (70.0) ref ref
Lower education (primary & secondary) 79 (52.3) 72 (47.7) 2.56 (0.64, 10.27) 0.19 1.36 3.90(0.83,18.46) 0.09
Higher education (tertiary) 19 (48.7) 20 (51.3) 2.21 (0.50,9.85) 0.30 1.57 4.79(0.88,26.17) 0.07
Employment status, n (%)
Retired/Non-employed 67 (53.2) 59 (46.8) ref
Employed 34 (45.9) 40 (54.1) 0.75 (0.42,1.33) 0.32
Household income,
n (%)
≤ RM 4,849 78 (50.3) 77 (49.7) ref
RM 4,850-RM10,959 14 (51.9) 13 (48.1) 1.06 (0.47, 2.41) 0.88
> RM 10,960 5 (50.0) 5 (50.0) 0.99 (0.28, 3.55) 0.98
Duration of T2DM, in years
≤ 5 years 45 (47.4) 50 (52.6) ref
> 5 years 56 (53.3) 49 (46.7) 1.27 (0.73, 2.21) 0.40
Treatment of T2DM
Diet/OADs 70 (51.5) 66 (48.5) ref
Insulin 29 (47.5) 32 (52.5) 0.85 (0.47,1.56) 0.61
Family history of T2DM
Yes 72 (50.0) 72 (50.0) ref
No 29 (51.8) 27 (48.2) 1.07 (0.58, 1.99) 0.82
BMI, mean (SD) 28.4 (4.8) 30.3 (6.4) 0.94 (0.89,0.99) 0.03 -0.04 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) 0.22
FBS, n (%)
≤ 7 mmol/L 33 (42.9) 44 (57.1) ref ref
> 7mmol/L 68 (55.3) 55 (44.7) 1.65 (0.93, 2.93) 0.09 0.94 2.55 (1.28, 5.07) 0.01
HbA1c level, mean (SD) 8.00 (2.0) 8.05 (2.1) 0.99 (0.86,1.14) 0.88
Systolic blood pressure, mean (SD) 137 (15.0) 140 (17.0) 0.98 (0.97,1.00) 0.19 -0.02 0.98 (0.96,1.00) 0.06
Diastolic blood pressure, mean (SD) 79 (9.0) 81 (9) 0.98 (0.95,1.00) 0.15 0.01 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) 0.53
Co-morbidities
Hypertension 79 (49.7) 80 (50.3) 0.85 (0.43,1.69) 0.65
Dyslipidaemia 72 (54.1) 61 (45.9) 1.60 (0.88,2.90) 0.12 0.46 1.59 0.16
Cardiovascular disease 9 (52.9) 8 (47.1) 1.11 (0.41, 3.01) 0.83 (0.83,3.05)
Cerebrovascular disease 5 (62.5) 3 (37.5) 1.67 (0.39,7.17) 0.50
Chronic kidney disease 6 (100.0) 0 (0.0) UTC 0.99

Hosmer-Lameshow test (p = 0.98), classification table (overall correctly classified percentage = 60.8%), and area under the ROC curve (69.8%) were applied to check the model fit. BOLD: significant results; UTC: unable to compute. a: simple logistic regression, b: multiple logistic regression.