Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;2022:5827097. doi: 10.1155/2022/5827097

Table 3.

The performance comparison of different methods in comparative experiments.

Category Method Feature type Type of input image Fusion Correct ratio (%) Computation cost Remarks
Conventional machine learning Naïve Bayes Hand-crafted features (Color + Shape + orientation) RGB Feature fusion 52.3 5.951 The approach in [10]
Bayesian logistic regression 62.3 5.951
RBF network 53.8 5.951
AD tree 71.5 5.952
Random forest 70.8 5.951
Voted perceptron 71.5 5.954
Bagging 64.6 5.951
Rotation forest 70.8 5.955
LWL 61.5 5.992

Deep learning Convolution neural network Automatically extracted features HSV 69.2 0.020 Designed for comparison
RGB 70.8 0.029
Depth 71.5 0.017
HSV + RGB + Depth Input fusion 74.6 0.052
HSV + RGB + Depth Feature fusion 82.3 0.103 Our approach