Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;145(4):685–700. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002764

Table 1.

Results from univariate analysis of malaria disease in Afghanistan 2009 with standard errors

Components Model 1a (without autoregression) Model 1b (with fixed parameters only) Model 1c (with random effects) Model 1d (with random effects + environmental data)
Endemic υi,t
α0 (s.e.) 9·223 (0·493) 14·532 (5·435)
Trend α1 (s.e.) −0·045 (0·079) 0·254 (0·571) −0·147 (0·076) −0·130 (0·075)
Sin α2 (s.e.) 0·923 (0·207) 6·228 (1·409) 1·399 (0·201) 1·330 (0·213)
Cos α3 (s.e.) −1·806 (0·150) −0·887 (0·438) −1·621 (0·097) −2·159 (0·082)
Inline graphic 2·152 2·1231
IID random effects 8·302 (0·485) 8·419 (0·506)
Autoregressive λi,t
β0 (s.e.) −0·031 (0·037) −0·518 (0·100) −1·165 (0·931)
Log Alt β1 (s.e.) 0·077 (0·122)
Precip β2 (s.e.) 0·015 (0·005)
Temp β3 (s.e.) 1·125 (0·022)
Neighbour-driven ϕ
γ0 (s.e.) −6·269 (0·906) −5·664 (0·435) −5·488 (0·526) −5·610 (0·660)
Overdispersion ψ (s.e.) 1·425 (0·116) 0·188 (0·019) 0·112 (0·012) 0·111 (0·012)
AIC 3248·06 2740·09
Inline graphic (P values) 7·169 (0·0091) 6·653 (0·0440) 6·815 (0·0739) 6·763
Inline graphic (P values) 509·359 (0·0007) 209·019 (0·0011) 133·606 (0·0012) 117·505

IID, Independent and identically distributed; AIC, Akaike's Information Criterion.

In the rows for Inline graphic and Inline graphic measures, the Monte Carlo P values give comparisons of malaria models 1a–1c to the best model (model 1d) based on permutation tests for paired observations (9999 permutations).