Table 2.
Characterization of dominant agroforestry technologies in the SSA region.
| Types of agroforestry technologies | Definition | Agroecological niches | Functional roles |
Tradeoffs | Selected references | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Productive | Protective | Social-economic support | |||||
| Cassava-based agroforestry | Agroforestry technologies dominated by cassava, intercropping with trees and/or food and cash crops. | Adaptable to various agroecological zones (arid Sahel, highlands and lowlands) | Biofuel feedstock, firewood, human food, animal feed, & industrial starch | Easing pressure forests | Income diversification | Aggravated soil erosion, fertility depletion, topsoil loss, forest loss and degradation | Onoja et al. (2019), Faße et al. (2014), Delaquis et al. (2017) |
| Taungya system | A shift cultivation agroforestry technology where communities cultivate food crops in forests until the trees mature enough. Dominant taungya types include leased, departmental and village systems. | Adaptable to different highlands and lowland forest types | Food crop production | High tree survival rates, soil fertility | Income to farmers and forestry department, reduced costs of forests plantation development, employment generation | Conflicts in land tenure systems, legal tussles between forestry departments and farmers on land use, tree-crop competition for available resources | Akamani and Holzmueller (2017), Steppler and Nair (1987), Menzies (1988) |
| Relay and mixed intercropping | Intercropping technology where succeeding crops are planted before harvesting the first crops within agroforestry lands | Adaptable to different ecological zones depending on the crops-trees combination | High food and biomass production, efficient resources use, crop diversification | Increased soil fertility with the right crops-trees rotation, erosion control, pests & diseases control | Increased farm returns and profitability | Soil infertility and acidification due to continuous food production, tree-crop competition for resources e.g., light, water, and nutrients | Sileshi et al. (2014), Tanveer et al. (2017), Castle et al. (2021) |
| Scattered agroforestry trees | A technology where agroforestry trees are dispersed in crop and grazing lands | Can adapt to different agroecological niches depending on the tree species and crop combination | Food, feeds and fodder provision, biomass source | Soil properties and fertility improvement, shade provision, microclimate control, biodiversity habitat and conservation, nutrients cycling | Low costs of tree management, income generation from different tree products | Competition between crops and trees for water and nutrients | Kelso and Jacobson, (2011), Tengnas (1994), Castle et al. (2021) |
| Terracing agroforestry technology | A technology of establishing trees on terraces along sloppy and hilly lands | Mostly applicable in sloppy highlands and hilly areas | Food, fodder, fuelwood production | soil and water conservation, soil fertility, erosion control, sedimentation control downstream | Increased farm yields and profitability | High costs of establishing (and maintaining) terraces in some landscapes | Kiptot & Franzel (2021), Onoja et al. (2019) |
| Silvopastoral/fodder agroforestry | Agroforestry technology that combines trees, shrubs, and forages with livestock production | Common in pasturelands and ranching systems, largely in the arid and semi-arid areas | Fodder, forage and food provision, fuelwood etc | Conserving biodiversity, carbon sinking, controlling soil erosion, shade provision, microclimate regulation | Income diversification | Potential introduction of invasive species | Balehegn, (2017), Silva-Galicia et al. (2020), Lemes et al. (2021) |
| Coffee agroforestry | Coffee production technology under different tree shading such as semi-forest, small-scale or large-scale coffee | Mostly in the East African highlands | Coffee production, food and fuelwood provision, timber, and non-timber products | Biodiversity conservation, soil fertility, microclimate regulation, shade provision | Income generation, employment creation | Deforestation for coffee expansion | Getachew (2013), Bucagu (2013), Jemal and Callo-Concha (2017), Duguma et al. (2021) |
| Fertility trees/shrubs systems | Development of tree and shrub in farmlands (for example Glyricidia/Cassia siamea) to enhance soil fertility through nitrogen-fixing to bring nutrients closer to the soil surface | multiple agroecological zones, especially those with degraded soils | Food, fodder, and fuelwood production | Soil fertility, nitrogen-fixing | Increased farm yield resulting in farm profitability | Teklehaimanot, (2004), Carsan et al. (2014), Cyamweshi et al. (2021) | |
| Improved tree fallows technology | A technology of planting legume trees and crops in rotation arrangement within the farmland | Different agroecological niches depending on trees-crops arrangement | Food, fodder, timber and non-timber products, biomass provision | Improved land productivity, soil fertility, soil carbon sequestration | Rural income diversification | Crop-trees competition for nutrients, water, and other resources | Onoja et al. (2019), Kaczan et al. (2013) |
| Home gardens | A small-scale production system mainly involving fruits, herbs, vegetables and sometimes animals located near or around the homestead for domestic consumption. | Different niches varying with crop and animal types | Food, fodder, and feeds production | Erosion control, shade | Improved health, income diversification | Steppler and Nair (1987); Depenbusch et al. (2021). | |