Table 3.
Implementation and equity issues for four childhood obesity interventions in the United States: CHOICES.
| Intervention | Quality of Evidencea | Equity | Acceptability to stakeholders | Feasibility | Sustain-ability | Side effects | Social and Policy Norms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax28 (SSB) | High quality RCT for children; moderate quality for adults | Neutral: Regressive tax, but health benefits, earmarking potential | Beverage industry opposition; national public opinion increasingly positive | Excise taxes common: very feasible | Likely; examples of other excise taxes like tobacco | Reduced diabetes, CVD independent of BMI | Substantial potential for shift in social norms with publicity surrounding successful implementation |
| Reduce Tax Subsidy of TV Advertising29 (TV AD) | High quality RCT linking TV and BMI | Potential to reduce inequality as minority children watch more TV | Likely food, beverage, advertising industry opposition | Plausible feasibility; needs to be implemented and survive court challenge | Likely if implemented | Other media advertising may increase | Publicity concerning law could lead to increased support |
| Early Child and Education Policy Changes31 (ECE) | High/moderate quality RCTs linking SSB, TV, physical activity to BMI | Potential for reduced disparities with policy change and increased disparities due to family based settings | 3 states already have so acceptable | States already regulate so feasible; cost a limiting factor | Yes but system for monitoring needed | Other effects on CVD, diabetes risk, dental health, as well as effects in the home and staff behaviors | Can increase awareness for issues among preschools |
| State Policy for Active Physical Education30 (Active PE) | High quality RCT linking PA and BMI and moderate quality longitudinal study | Potential for negative effect on equity as only schools with PE can implement | Acceptable to policy-makers; teachers require training | Feasible with training for staff; cost major limiting factor | Likely but system for monitoring needed | Effects on fitness, reduced CVD health, class-room behavior, no harm to academic achievement | Can boost support for physical activity during school day |
BMI, Body Mass Index; CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; RCT, Randomized Controlled Trial, SSB, Sugar-sweetened Beverage; TV, Television
Quality of evidence for the primary behavioral link to BMI, using GRADE rating.40