TABLE 5.
Mean, standard deviation, treatment effect on the treated (ATET propensity score matching) for future intent for gender and ethnic groups in traditional laboratory and SEA-PHAGES courses (n = 200)
Estimation method | Future intent | Intent to complete science degree | |
---|---|---|---|
Men PEERAre there differences in the future intent because of ethnicity or race (PEER) and White/Asian male students in the SEA-PHAGES program? | |||
SEA-PHAGESMen PEERMen White/Asian | 3.57 (1.32) 3.75 (1.07) | 4.24 (0.98) 4.18 (1.09) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | 0.030.170.180.85 | −0.070.18−0.380.7 |
Are there differences in the future intent because of ethnicity or race (PEER) male students in the SEA-PHAGES program and the traditional laboratory? | |||
PEER menSEA-PHAGESTraditional lab | 3.57 (0.14) 3.17 (0.16) | 4.24 (0.1) 4.12 (0.11) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | 0.310.16−1.90.05 | −0.360.2−1.780.08 |
Are there differences in the future intent because of ethnicity or race (PEER) and White/Asian male students in the traditional laboratory? | |||
TraditionalMen PEERMen White/Asian | 3.17 (0.15) 3.6 (0.1) | 4.12 (0.11) 3.9 (0.13) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | −0.0020.15−0.020.98 | −0.090.17−0.580.56 |
Women PEERAre there differences in the future intent because of ethnicity or race (PEER) and White/Asian female students in the SEA-PHAGES program? | |||
SEA-PHAGESWomen PEERWomen White/Asian | 3.96 (0.1) 4.06 (0.1) | 4.33 (0.1) 4.57 (0.08) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | −0.0090.19−0.050.96 | 0.170.161.030.3 |
Are there differences in the research experiences because of ethnicity or race (PEER) female students in the SEA-PHAGES program and the traditional laboratory? | |||
PEER womenSEA-PHAGESTraditional lab | 3.97 (0.1) 3.37 (0.13 | 4.32 (0.1) 3.97 (0.12) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | −0.710.28−2.560.01* | −0.490.27−1.810.07 |
Are there differences in the future intent because of ethnicity or race (PEER) and White/Asian female students in the traditional laboratory? | |||
TraditionalWomen PEERWomen White/Asian | 3.61 (1.23) 3.7 (1.13) | 4.11 (1.14) 4.10 (1.18) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | 0.290.281.040.3 | −0.330.22−1.540.13 |
GenderAre there differences in the research experiences of male and female students in the SEA-PHAGES program? | |||
SEA-PHAGESMenWomen | 3.58 (0.12) 4.07 (0.09) | 4.16 (0.11) 4.49 (0.09) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | 0.390.152.600.009* | 0.490.192.580.01* |
Are there differences in the research experiences of male and female students in the traditional laboratory course? | |||
TraditionalMenWomen | 3.24 (0.15) 3.52 (0.12) | 4.13 (0.12) 4.22 (0.1) | |
ATET propensity score matching | Coeff.SEzSig. | −0.150.2−0.730.47 | −0.290.14−2.130.03* |
*Significant at 0.05 level following a Holm-Bonferroni correction.