Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 17;2022:8269221. doi: 10.1155/2022/8269221

Table 2.

Details of comparison between diode laser and sclerotherapy.

Laser group STS group Chi sq- P-value
Details of site of involvement
 Gingiva 19(44.2%) 13 (43.3%) 2.833 0.844 NS
 Tongue 8 (18.6%) 7 (23.3%)
 Buccal mucosa 3 (7%) 2 (6.7%)
 Upper lip 3 (7%) 3 (10%)
 Lower lip 2 (4.7%) 2 (6.7%)
 Lower labial mucosa 2 (4.7%) 1 (3.3%)
 Upper labial mucosa 1 (2.3%) 1 (3.3%)
 Palate 3 (7%) 0
 Retrocommissural area 2 (4.7%) 1 (3.3%)
 Total 43 (100%) 30 (100%)

Details of size of involvement
 Less than 1.5 cm 22 (51.1%) 11 (36.6%) 1.825 0.401 NS
 1.6-2.0 cm 18 (41.8%) 15 (50%)
 More than 2.0 cm 3 (7.1%) 4 (13.4)
 Total 43 (100%) 30 (100%)

Details of the number of session
 1 session 35 (81.3%) 05 (16.6%) 29.89 <0.001 ∗∗
 More than 1 session 08 (18.6%) 25 (83.4%)
 Total 43 (100%) 30 (100%)

Details of the side effects
 Bleeding 27 (62.8%) (minor bleeding) 17 (56.7%) (minor bleeding) 0.277 0.599 NS
 Pain 33 (76.7%) 30 (100%) 8.084 0.004
 Edema 04 (9.3%) 10 (13.3%) 6.584 0.010
 Superficial ulceration 00 30 (100%) 73 <0.001 ∗∗
 Ecchymosis/necrosis 00 02(6.7%) 2.947 0.086 NS
 Infection 00 02 (6.7%) 2.947 0.086 NS
 Scarring 05 (11.6%) 02 (6.7%) 7.694 0.006

Details of the VAS scale on the 3rd day of treatment
 7-10 VAS 00 22 (7.37%) 51.447 <0.001 ∗∗
 4-6 VAS 15 (34.9%) 08 (26.7%)
 1-3 VAS 23 (53.5%) 00
 0 VAS/no pain 05 (11.6%) 00
 Total 43 (100%) 30 (100%)

Response of treatment to individual groups
 Complete response 43 (100%) 27 (90%) 4.484 0.034
 Moderate response 00 00
 No response 00 03
 Total 43 (100%) 30 (100%)

Time required for complete resolution/healing
 1 week 08 (18.6%) 00 27.378 <0.001 ∗∗
 2 weeks 23 (53.5%) 04 (13.3%)
 3 weeks 12 (27.9%) 21 (7.5)
 More than 3 weeks 00 05 (16.7%)
 Total 43 (100%) 30 (100%)

Details of the recurrences based on site
 Recurrences 04 (9.3%) 00 2.322 0.067 NS
 No recurrence 39 (90.7%) 30 (100%)
 Total 43 (100%) 30 (100%)