Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 26;9(5):1305–1327. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00472-7

Table 3.

Primary efficacy endpoint parameters from pooled reanalysis of patient reported data from prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies in adult patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee treated with an oral combination therapy or the gold standard nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug [13]

Intention-to-treat population OEC (n = 348) Diclofenac (n = 349) Difference (OEC therapy/diclofenac)
LAFI
At baseline, mean (SD) 12.6 (2.4) 12.7 (2.4) Not significant
At end of treatment, mean (SD) 9.1 (3.9) 9.1 (4.2) Not significant
Absolute difference, mean (SD) –3.5 (4.2) –3.6 (4.3) Not significant
Relative difference (%), mean (SD) –27.8 (30.8) –28.3 (32.1) Not significant
Effect size (Cohen’s d)a 0.9 0.88 Not significant
Significance of LAFI at baseline vs. study end within treatment groups  < 0.001  < 0.001
 ≤ 7b at baseline, n (%) 3 (0.9) 4 (1.1) Not significant
 ≤ 7 at end of treatment, n (%) 115 (33) 117 (33.5) Not significant
Difference in LAFI ≤ 7 at baseline vs. study end, absolute (relative), n (%) for each treatment 112 (31) 113 (32.1) Not significant
Significance of the difference in LAFI ≤ 7 at baseline vs. study end within treatment groups  < 0.001  < 0.001
 Relief ≥ 30%, n (%) 138 (39.7) 143 (41) Not significant
 Relief ≥ 50%, n (%) 82 (23.6) 84 (24.1) Not significant
 Relief ≥ 3 points, n (%) 185 (53.2) 192 (55) Not significant

LAFI Lequesne Algofunctional index, OEC oral enzyme combination therapy, SD standard deviation

aThis Cohen’s d effect size is the standardized mean difference in LAFI for OEC vs. diclofenac

bA LAFI ≤ 7 indicates only minor/mild OA impairment