Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 26;77(10):976–986. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217463

Table 4.

One-way sensitivity analysis in the posthospital population

Cost difference (£) QALY difference ICER (£/QALY) Probability cost-effective*
Varying the rate ratio
 Best-case NIV +£4855 +0.596 £8146 100%
 Worst-case NIV +£4715 −0.220 Dominated 1.1%
 Base case +£4799 +0.424 £11 318 99.9%
 Best case ‘Western’ settings NIV† +£4765 +0.539 £8979 100%
 Worst-case ‘Western’ settings NIV† +£4687 −0.215 Dominated 0%
Change in utility on NIV
 +0.20 utility +£4799 +1.005 £4763 100%
 +0.10 utility +£4799 +0.714 £6707 100%
 +0.05 utility +£4799 +0.571 £8385 100%
 −0.05 utility +£4799 +0.280 £17 104 71.1%
 −0.10 utility +£4799 +0.135 £35 526 5.4%
 −0.20 utility +£4799 −0.158 Dominated 0%
Varying duration of effect
 2 years +£4813 +0.218 £22 078 26.0%
 5 years (base case) +£4799 +0.424 £11 318 99.9%
 10 years (model horizon) +£4172 +0.535 £7798 99.9%
Alternate model time horizon
 2 years +£919 +0.073 £12 589 78.9%
 5 years +£2187 +0.260 £8408 99.5%
 10 years (base case) +£4799 +0.424 £11 318 99.9%
 20 years +£5763 +0.484 £11 914 99.4%
Alternate Mortality and readmission risk
 Lower risks from Bucknall et al 14 +£3715 +0.173 £21 473 39.34%
 Doubling all mortality risks13 15 +£3953 +0.400 £9883 99.9%

*Cost-effective at £20 000/QALY.

†Western studies included studies from Italy, Poland, the Netherlands, Germany, and the UK.

ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; NIV, non-invasive ventilation; QALY, quality-adjusted life year.