Table 7.
Purchasing behavior | Consumer responses | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Shrimp | Finfish | |||
Penaeus monodon | Macrobrachium rosenbergii | Saltwater | Freshwater | |
Change in amount purchased | ||||
Increased | 27 | 20 | 6 | 9 |
Decreased | 0 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
No change | 32 | 39 | 51 | 41 |
No response | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reason for change | ||||
I have not changed the species purchased | 32 | 38 | 51 | 41 |
I have changed the species because they are more available | 15 | 11 | 5 | 8 |
I have changed the species because they are cheaper | 0 | 1a | 5b | 5c |
I have changed the species because they are more nutritious | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
I have changed the species because they are easier to prepare | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I have changed the species because they are better for the immune system | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 1 | 6 | 12 |
aFrom other response: “Macrobrachium rosenbergii was more costly than the Penaeus monodon”
bFrom other responses: “Penaeus monodon consumption has increased for being more reasonable”, “Other shrimp species were available at a reasonable price” & “Purchase power reduced for margining income” (three responses)
cFrom other responses: “Other shrimp species have become reasonable”, “Other shrimp species have become available and reasonable” (two responses) & “Purchase power reduced for margining income” (two responses)