Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 12;9:968800. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.968800

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical characteristics after anti-VEGF Treatment with PM-CNV.

Characteristics Type 1 Type 2 P P1 P2
BCVA (LogMAR), median (IQR) 0.45 (0.4–0.5) 0.6 (0.53–0.7) 0.001 a <0.001 b <0.001 b
CNV area, (mm2), median (IQR) 0 (0–0.02) 0.015 (0–0.026) 0.125a <0.001 b <0.001 b
HRF height, (μm), median (IQR) 0 (0–0) 30.5 (0–80.75) <0.001 a 0.018 b <0.001 b
Appearance of EZ Intact = 20 Intact = 15 <0.001 c —— 0.021 c
Disrupted = 0 Disrupted = 9
Absent =0 Absent = 4
Appearance of RPE Intact = 20 Intact = 10 <0.001 c —— 0.001 c
Disrupted = 0 Disrupted = 12
Absent =0 Absent = 6

PM, pathologic myopia; CNV, choroidal neovascularization; SD, standard deviation; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; LogMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; IQR, interquartile range; HRF, hyperreflective foci; EZ, ellipsoid zone; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; P, type 1 vs. type 2 after treatment; P1, type 1 before and after treatment; P2, type 2 before and after treatment; P with statistical significance is shown in boldface; aMann - Whitney test; bWilcoxon signed rank test; cFisher exact text.