Table 2.
Multivariate analysis of risks factors for neurocognitive decline after RT.
Neurocognitive outcome metrica | Age during RT | Time since RT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval] | p -Value | Incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval] | p -Value | |
Neurocognitive performance: | ||||
International shopping list | −0.06 [−0.20, 0.08] | NS | −0.11 [−0.23, 0.02] | NS |
Network variability: | ||||
Salience | −0.001 [−0.0015, −0.0009] | <0.0001 | −0.001 [−0.0014, −0.0008] | <0.0001 |
Frontoparietal | −0.0008 | <0.002 | −0.0008 | <0.002 |
L-dorsal attention | −0.001 [−0.0015, −0.0007] | <0.0001 | −0.001 [−0.0014, −0.0006] | <0.002 |
R-dorsal attention | −0.0015 [−0.0022, −0.0008] | <0.002 | −0.0013 [−0.0020, −0.0007] | <0.002 |
Functional connectivity: | ||||
Modularity | −0.0055 [−0.0087, −0.0023] | <0.005 | −0.0057 [−0.0087, −0.0023] | <0.002 |
Efficiency | −0.0017 [−0.0019, −0.0014] | <0.0001 | −0.0016 [−0.0018, −0.0014] | <0.0001 |
Imaging metrics represent surrogate measures of neurocognitive status and are normalized by age at the time of imaging.