Table 2.
Sensor-derived parameters demonstrating significant correlations with clinical measures.
Task | Domain | Variable | Parameter | Healthy Controls (n = 10) | Brunnstrom Stage
16
|
Pearson’s correlation coefficient Statistical Significancea | Statistical significanceb | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 (n = 2) | 4 (n = 2) | 5 (n = 3) | 6 (n = 2) | ||||||||
Forearm supination/pronation | |||||||||||
ARAT | 1 | angle | aMSS | 18.03 | 8.67 | 10.56 | 14.08 | 16.78 | 0.767 | P = 0.016 | P = 0.014 |
ARAT | 4 | angle | aMSS | 38.22 | 11.40 | 16.14 | 23.06 | 29.92 | 0.725 | P = 0.027 | P = 0.004 |
ARAT | Full | angle | aMSS | 19.30 | 9.94 | 12.71 | 14.89 | 16.15 | 0.753 | P = 0.019 | P = 0.002 |
ADL task | Full | angle | AMS | 0.60 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.37 | 0.741 | P = 0.022 | P < 0.001 |
Wrist dorsiflexion/volarflexion | |||||||||||
ARAT | 2 | angle | aMSS | 13.68 | 7.71 | 7.73 | 9.88 | 12.38 | 0.764 | P = 0.017 | P = 0.001 |
ARAT | Full | angle | aMSS | 13.57 | 7.23 | 8.62 | 11.61 | 14.31 | 0.877 | P = 0.002 | P = 0.001 |
Elbow flexion/extension | |||||||||||
ARAT | 1 | angle | aMSS | 32.91 | 9.12 | 14.49 | 22.29 | 22.23 | 0.745 | P = 0.021 | P<0.001 |
ARAT | 3 | angle | aMSS | 15.60 | 9.12 | 15.32 | 19.23 | 21.96 | 0.800 | P = 0.010 | P = 0.040 |
ARAT | Full | angle | aMSS | 28.21 | 10.49 | 14.67 | 19.33 | 19.39 | 0.728 | P = 0.026 | P<0.001 |
ARAT | 3 | angle | AMS | 0.63 | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.728 | P = 0.026 | P<0.001 |
ARAT total performance time (sec) | 122.44 | 353.04 | 268.16 | 223.42 | 179.90 | −0.914 | P <0.001 | P = 0.010 |
aPearson’s correlation coefficient for the parameter versus ARAT score.
bComparison between healthy controls and patient using paired t tests.
Abbreviations: ARAT, Action Research Arm Test; aMSS, average motion segment size; AMS, average motion speed.